Pubdate: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 Source: Georgia Straight, The (CN BC) Copyright: 2017 The Georgia Straight Contact: http://www.straight.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1084 Author: Travis Lupck Page: 13 Cited: VANDU: http://www.vandu.org/ Cited: Canadian Drug Policy Coalition: http://drugpolicy.ca/ DRUG RESPONDERS MEET PM Last Sunday (January 29), Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould sat down in Vancouver with a roomful of people on the frontlines of B.C.'S fentanyl crisis. Trudeau, who was in Vancouver for the Chinese New Year parade, attended the morning meeting at SUCCESS'S Pender Street offices in Chinatown. There were about a dozen stakeholders there for the private meeting at the social-services agency, including Vancouver's police and fire chiefs. Three points were repeated by just about everyone in attendance, according to interviews with five of those people. The first was a call for Ottawa to declare a federal health emergency. The second was a request for funding for addictions treatment. The third, for the Canadian government to consider the pros and cons of the full legalization and regulation of hard drugs like heroin and cocaine. Coco Culbertson is a programs manager with the Portland Hotel Society, which runs Vancouver's supervised-injection facility, Insite, and 15 social-housing projects in the Downtown Eastside. "Everyone brought up full legalization," she said. And the prime minister's response? "His reaction was that it made common sense, but that creating a policy that reflects common sense, especially around drug-policy reform, is far more complicated than he anticipated," Culbertson recounted. "To legalize and regulate marijuana, I think he has been surprised by how difficult it has been." She said Trudeau's reaction was not encouraging but left open the possibility of further dialogue down the road. "I don't think that this discussion is over with him," Culbertson continued. "I think he heard us very loud and clear. And if he is given a second mandate by the voters of the country, then we could have an opportunity to take it up then." Donald MacPherson is executive director of the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition and a former drug-policy coordinator for the City of Vancouver. He told the Straight that regardless of Trudeau's actual thoughts on the legalization of hard drugs, the prime minister made it clear that an end to prohibition is simply not politically viable. "In the context of what's happening now with [legalizing] cannabis, the sense I got was, 'One step at a time, folks.' " Lori Shaver, president of the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU), told the Straight she left the room with a negative view on the meeting. "The main thing that I pressed is that we need to have legalization," she began. "And he tried to shut it right down. "He said that he's had such a hard time with the marijuana, that with heroin it would be even worse. But legalization is what has to be done." (Legalization involves bringing the supply of narcotics under government control and heavily regulating their distribution and sale. Decriminalization simply removes judicial penalties for possessing drugs, leaving supply in the hands of criminals who might cut drugs like heroin with even more dangerous substances such as fentanyl.) Also in the room with the prime minister were Thomas Kerr, a lead researcher with the B.C. Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Portland Hotel Society executive director Jennifer Breakspear, and Sue Ouelette, a frontline responder who works at one of the city's new injection sites. Trudeau reportedly made no commitment to any policy during the meeting. The Prime Minister's Office did not respond to a request for comment. Last year 914 people died of an illicit-drug overdose in B.C. The synthetic opioid fentanyl was associated with 60 percent of those deaths. Other key points those stakeholders were in agreement on were the need for the declaration of a federal health emergency and for more funding required for treatment options. "The entire room wanted a national emergency or a national crisis proclaimed," Culbertson said. "If we are not talking about it on a national level, as a national emergency, then the drug users' lives are not equal to other lives that are lost." - --- MAP posted-by: Matt