Source: Canberra Times Contact: Fri, 01 Aug 97 Swedish heroin trial flawed from the start I'M WRITING in response to the July 12 letter of John E Miller, national secretary of the Australian Christian Coalition. Mr Miller's letter implied that because Sweden trialled a "permissive approach to illicit drug use", the country became the "highest drugusing nation in Europe" then, by reversing the permissive drug policy, became the country with the lowest drug use in Europe. I believe the "permissive approach" he referred to was a twoyear trial begun in April 1965. In that trial health authorities allowed some doctors to prescribe opiates and stimulants to just over 200 clients. The trial was flawed and any conclusions drawn from it of dubious value. According to an article in the International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol 6, No. 2 1995, most of the 10 doctors who started in the trial left and one of the remaining doctors who took care of 156 of the clients allowed them to write their own prescriptions. Also, the trial had no control group. Without a control group there was no mechanism to determine whether or not the drugprescribing program caused the rising number of injecting drug consumers or if the number was due to a rise throughout Europe and North America at that time. A report on the experiment is the basis for every claim that Sweden's prescribing trial led to a "massive rise of the number of addicts" in the 1960s. While Sweden now presents itself as having an effective zerotolerance policy on drug consumption, the reality is quite different. The journal article identified above, quotes a Swedish newspaper stating that drug use and violence are escalating out of control and that Sweden is heading for a similar situation to that of the USA. In June 1995 the Swedish Minister of Justice is quoted as saying that there is a clear connection between a rise in violent crime in Sweden and availability of illegal drugs and weapons. PATRICIA VARGA Holt