Pubdate: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 Source: Contra Costa Times, Second Editorial Contact: Reefer madness '90s style LAST NOVEMBER, California voters demonstrated their support for the medical use of marijuana by passing Proposition 215. The percentages of approval were even higher in the East Bay than statewide with 63 percent of Contra Costa County voters favoring the measure and 71 percent of Alameda County. Voters saw the initiative for what it was: an easy way to give people with painful conditions, such as AIDS, cancer or glaucoma, an other choice. That's why it was named the Compassionate Use Act Some studies and anecdotal evidence have indicated that marijuana can ease the pain of these and other debilitating illnesses. Unfortunately, roadblocks seem to appear at every turn to keep the controversial measure from taking hold. Opponents are convinced that it will destroy the fabric of our society, that our children will be ruined and that cannabis clubs will spring up on every street corner like taverns. Last December; drug czar Barry McCaffrey threatened to prosecute doctors who recommended marijuana to patients on the grounds that it sends the wrong message to children. A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction in May stopping federal action against physicians who included marijuana in their treatment options. But in light of McCaffrey's threats, the California Medical Association issued some safeguards in an attempt to keep doctors out of trouble. The CMA instructed doctors not to write prescriptions for pot and not to tell patients how to obtain it. But they could mention it as a possible treatment in a patient's chart. This irrational stream of circumstances continued into local government as well. Contra Costa County District Attorney Gary Yancey in essence has said that cannabis clubs will open here over his dead body. Since cannabis clubs operate in San Francisco and Alameda County, he reasons that anyone wanting it badly enough can travel there. His attitude should insult not only the sick who are in need of pain relief but also freemarket economists, who contend the marketplace should be the arbiter of whether a demand exists. When local entrepreneur Bobby Judd approached the Martinez City Council, and later the Concord City Council, with a proposition to open a deliveryonly dispensary business they quickly slapped a moratorium on any marijuanarelated business. Granted, this is new territory for suburban city councils. Maybe they need a little time to work out local ordinances and zoning. But they shouldn't stall or put off a decision indefinitely simply because it's a business that they may not feel comfortable with. They should deal with those technicalities quickly and sensibly. The medical use of marijuana is allowed under California law now and there is no constitutional reason for it to be overturned. The sooner that state, county and local leaders accept that, the better it will be for everyone