Pubdate: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 Source: Plain Dealer, Cleveland (OH) Author: D. Day & K Vail Clean-needle programs save lives and money by Kenneth A. Vail and Dawn Day Vail is the director of Xchange Point in Cleveland. Day is the director of the Dogwood Center in Princeton, N.J. Hundreds of lives will be saved in just the next few years, if Cleveland's clean-needle programs are supported and allowed to expand. Mayor Michael R. White has taken an important step toward saving those lives: He is negotiating with Xchange Point, an AIDS service organization, so that it can reopen its clean-needle program. Clean-needle programs, by slowing the spread of HIV, can save the lives of people who inject drugs, their nondrug-using wives and husbands and their newborn children. Consider the difference access to sterile needles makes. Uninfected young adults who experiment with injecting illicit drugs and then stop have their whole lives before them. HIV-infected individuals who stop using illicit drugs must face painful, debilitating and costly illnesses and treatment and, very likely, premature death. Clean-needle programs not only save lives, they save millions of dollars. For every HIV infection avoided, at least $120,000 in medical costs are saved. The new protease inhibitors that are now prolonging the lives of a number of AIDS sufferers are not changing the situation with regard to cost. The new drugs cost as much as $15,000 a year. In the last five years, six major studies funded by the federal government have concluded that clean-needle programs reduce HIV transmission and do not increase the use of injected drugs. Many public health experts, including the former Surgeon General, Dr. Joycelyn Elders, have spoken out in favor of clean-needle programs. Opponents of needle exchange programs say they do not believe the research. Researchers can make mistakes, but the evidence in the case of clean-needle programs is massive. In the face of a spreading and deadly epidemic, we need to act on the information available. Some who oppose clean-needle programs say that they are concerned that when we give out sterile needles we are relaying out a double message. But we have many policies that inform people who inject drugs that their behavior is antisocial and self-destructive -- everything from public service announcements to prison sentences. And even without clean-needle programs, we send double messages about drug use. When a person who injects drugs has an overdose or suffers a severe reaction to a substance used to cut the drug, we rush that person to a hospital and give him or her the best medical care we can. We do not want them to die. We do not say to the drug user's family and friends, Sorry, we cannot give your family member life-saving medical care because it would send the wrong message. Getting sterile needles to persons who inject drugs is also about medical care and saving lives. Americans understand that injecting drugs is a bad idea and that people in need of preventive medical intervention should receive it. A recent national survey found that two-thirds of all Americans favor needle exchange programs as a way of saving lives and stopping the spread of HIV/AIDS. Given the medical consensus that has emerged on the effectiveness of sterile needles as a way of avoiding the spread of drug-related HIV/AIDS, it is difficult to see the denial of access to sterile needles as anything other than the denial of access to a lifesaving medical intervention. Clean-needle programs like Xchange Point are not just about giving out clean needles. Needle exchange workers also provide sex education, condoms, referrals to HIV testing and referrals to drug treatment, as well as other services. Clean-needle programs help protect police from the danger of a needle stick when they are frisking someone. Needle exchange programs take infected needles out of circulation. A sterile needle with its protective cap is no danger to a police officer. Clean-needle programs help reduce problems with discarded needles. In a Portland, Oregon, neighborhood where discarded needles had been a problem, fewer discarded needles were found after the exchange opened, because drug users had an incentive to keep their dirty needles and trade them in for sterile ones at the exchange. With sterile-needle programs that reach substantial numbers of drug users, we can slow this horrible AIDS epidemic among injecting drug users in Cleveland before it is widespread. Let us do it now. Kenneth A. Vail and Dawn Day