] Subj: COMMENT: Damaging addiction to an empty old slogan
] Date: Sun, July 6, 1997
Source: Scotland On Sunday, Edinburgh, UK
Contact: COMMENTARY: Damaging addiction to an empty old slogan
Alan Cochrane explains why he no longer thinks the Just Say No anti
drugs campaign is a good strategy

It is the very model of the responsible adult's attitude to drugs  Just 
Say No. Total, absolute zero tolerance. Young people must have nothing 
to do with them. And that's final.

In the past, even the recent past, whenever anyone varied from that 
theme, I have always joined in the castigation. It was an easy route to 
follow and, superficially at least, always made perfect sense. Any 
message from authority which said anything other than Just Say No could 
with impunity be portrayed as tacit and wicked  acceptance of drugs 
and drug use.

As a society we have spent millions on the message and for the most part 
have felt immensely comforted and proud of our rectitude on the matter.

The great tragedy is, however, that he people at whom the message has 
been directed have not been listening. Just Say No is not just a failure 
as a campaign, it is actually having an effect the complete opposite of 
that which was intended.

The armies of wellmeaning ministers, civil servants and their equally 
wellmeaning PR and advertasining men have failed. And people like me, 
who shouted encores and encouragement from the wings, have been plain 
daft to do so.

For the majority of adults who have little or no contact with the drug 
culture which now infests the lives of young people, the attraction of 
telling them not to go near drugs is a powerful one  just as powerful 
as all the other things we tell them not to do. And just as pointless. 
Most of us have little comprehension of the subject and forbidding them 
from getting involved is much easier than actually learning something 
about the problem and trying to address it from their point of view.

My conversion came not in a blinding flash, but after talking to young 
people  ages between 14 and 20  over the last few weeks, where it 
quickly became clear that they had nothing but contempt for our approach 
and, what was more, they were not listening to it nor had any intention 
of following the advice.

The sophistication about drug abuse, among even the youngest of them, 
was staggering to me  someone who is at least a generation away from 
the problem. They are scornful of  if they knoew how to articulate 
their contempt  the naivete od a campaign which tells them not to do 
something which huge numbers of them are already doing.

This arrogance of youth is simply not going to be deflected by 
straightforward negatives. We must think harder about what we are trying 
to do.

And surely that is the much more pressing concern  to stop young people 
killing themselves with drugs.

The current official thinking has it that by continually saying 'No' we 
will keep teenagers away from drugs altogether and they will not then 
get themselves into a position where they can damage their bodies and 
minds. That scenario conveniently, but tragically, ignores the fact that 
a huge number of the people we as a society are talking to are already 
doing what we are urging them not to do.

By banging away on this theme, we are trying to defy reality and, more 
importantly, failing to spend what are finite resources on the real 
issue.

It is too late to Just Say No.Too many young people have already said 
'yes' and we will not get them back by persevering with a failed slogan.

Instead, those who order these things must accept that a complete change 
of direction is required, at least for the older teenagers. Of course, 
we should try to wean them away from drugs. But basically they should be 
told that if they must take drugs, then there are definite and specific 
dangers and they must be educated into using them safely.

The proponents of zero tolerance will hold up theit hands in horror  as 
I used to do  and cry that this approach condones and even encourages 
drug abuse. It does not  it merely accepts that as a society we have 
failed miserably to protect our children from the drug pushers. In 
addition, confronting the world as it is and not as we would like it to 
be, we should accept that many of them are already heavily involved in 
the culture of substance abuse. The best we can do is to protect them 
from the worst affects.

It will also be argued that the total abstinence approach will 
discourage those who have not yet dabbled with drugs from their first 
steps down a fairly miserable path. That is debatable. However, its 
worst crime is that it ignores the plight of those already fully 
committed to drug use.

They think they know what they are doing. They think they know all there 
is to know about drugs and their effects. The mounting death toll tells 
us that they don't and that is where the bulk of our effort should now 
focus.

If there is aplace for a Just Say No campaign, then it is among the very 
young  children not yet in their teens, who might yet be deflected from 
trying the substances their elders have taken to much alacrity.

But for the rest, the bulk of our young people, the emphasis must be 
switched away from all those expensive and dogooding television 
commercials and posters and the money spent instead at grassroots (if 
you will forgive the pun) level  in the schools and colleges, in the 
pubs and clubs. There it should be spent on preaching safety and caution 
and on effective counselling. This may make a bit less money for the 
television companies, and the wordsmiths in the big agencies, but I am 
sure they will gladly forgo their commissions for the good of society.

We must continue to insist that places of entertainment ban drugs from 
their premises; and I am not suggesting that we make drugtaking easy. 
But we should accept that those who want them will find them.

In Scotland, as in the rest of the UK, we know that drug abuse is the 
greatest threat to our young people and we must continue to use the 
criminal justice system to its utmost, and the police and other 
enforcement agencies, to hammer those who trade in these deadly 
commodities.

But we must accept thqat we have failed to prevent drugs taking such a 
hold on so many young people and consequently those who purport to be on 
the high moral ground must concede that they have failed.

Just Say No is a good slogan, but the fact is today that it is little 
more than that, at least for the bulk of the audience at which it was 
aimed.

It is time to abandon it before any more damage is done.