Source: Los Angeles Times Contact: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 Author: MARK FINEMAN, Times Staff Writer In Court: Cocaine, Caribbean, Conspiracy Drugs: Federal case against Texasborn man calls Dominican Republic pivotal for narcotics trade. By MARK FINEMAN, Times Staff Writer MIAMIWhen Luis Cano was arrested outside his $561,000 home in suburban Miami Lakes last year, the Texasborn businessman had been out of the United States for more than a year, according to one of his lawyers. Cano had divided that time between Mexico and the Dominican Republic, where he was setting up a casino business, defense attorney Emilia DiazFox told a federal judge here a month after Cano's arrest on drug charges. "Apparently," DiazFox said then, "he liked the environment" in the Caribbean nation, which is widely known for its freewheeling business climate, beach resorts, limited government regulation and now, U.S. law enforcement agencies say, a booming drugsmuggling and moneylaundering trade that is helping to supply the United States' multibilliondollar cocaine market. U.S. prosecutors, who began presenting their first witnesses and evidence in their case against Cano to a federal jury in Miami this week, will seek to prove he headed "a massive drug conspiracy," court documents show. That organization, they allege, was responsible for importing tons of Colombian cocaine into U.S. cities, from Los Angeles to New York, between 1987 and 1996. Before the trial ends, the documents indicate, prosecutors will present scores of witnesses and official records in an effort to prove that Cano's organization also "washed" tens of millions of dollars in drug profitsthrough casinos, real estate, aircraft, racehorses and even a professional baseball teamin the Dominican Republic and elsewhere. The case potentially offers a picture of the tentaclelike reach of such conspiracies: In addition to cocaineproducing Colombia and transit nations Mexico and the Dominican Republic, it touches the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Miami, a suburban Detroit police department, a south Texas town, a Miami defense attorney, a former U.S. prosecutor and drug figures in New York and Chicago. Law enforcement agents say the case against Cano and nine accused coconspirators, including two prominent Dominican businessmen, illustrates the pivotal way traffickers have used the Dominican Republic to help supply illegal drugs to the U.S. and to conceal the huge profits they generate. "We're not talking about a gardenvariety conspiracy here. We're talking about a massive conspiracy," Asst. U.S. Atty. Randy Hummel, coprosecutor in the case, declared at a federal court hearing earlier this year. Cano has consistently pleaded not guilty since his arrest 16 months ago. His attorneys have flatly denied the government's charges. They insist that Cano, who is 37 and of Mexican descent, is a legitimate businessman, a loving husband and father "who is as American as apple pie." "The government only has snitch testimony," DiazFox told the federal judge last year. "The government doesn't have anything that's concrete. . . . This is government snitches at their worst." Since that hearing, however, DEA investigators have used undercover agents, wiretaps, financial documents and cooperating drug traffickers, leading to indictments in the Midwest: Earlier this year, federal prosecutors charged the deputy chief and several members of the Royal Oak Township Police Department in suburban Detroit with protecting the organization's cocaine shipments. Prosecutors also won an indictment of a relative in Chicago of Mexico's late drug kingpin Amado Carrillo Fuentes on charges of running the group's distribution network there. Tracing the Assets But it is the case against Cano himself that federal agents and prosecutors assert will show how the Dominican Republic has been used by the Colombian organizations that U.S. counternarcotics officials blame for supplying most of the cocaine consumed in the United States. "This organization has substantial assets in the Dominican Republic . . . which was the home base for Mr. Luis Cano," prosecutor Hummel stated. "The [U.S.] government already has seized in the Dominican Republic, and through the cooperation of the Dominican Republic, three aircraft worth several million dollars that were the assets of this conspiracy. . . . Mr. Cano holds substantial assets down there." Among those assets, U.S. law enforcement agents say, are properties held by the two Dominicans who were indicted along with Cano: Casino owner Edmon Elias and Ricardo Hernandez, who owns the Cibao Eagles, one of the nation's most popular baseball teams, were accused along with Cano of laundering millions of dollars in cocaine profits through their enterprises. According to court records, prosecutors will try to show how Cano allegedly funneled those drug proceeds through the Dominican companies to make them appear as legitimate assets and income. For example, the prosecutors stated, real estate in the Dominican capital, Santo Domingo, and the three aircraft were all "purchased with or traceable to proceeds from Cano's drugtrafficking organization." "The government's evidence in this case establishes the Dominican Republic as the location used by this organization to secrete millions of dollars of narcoticsderived proceeds," Hummel concluded in a court filing Aug. 29. Neither Elias nor Hernandez has responded to the allegations in court documents here. The two businessmenfor whom arrest warrants were issued April 2 and who are considered fugitives by the United Stateshave taken out advertising in the Dominican Republic asserting their innocence. U.S. officials say it has been difficult, at best, to extradite fugitives from the Dominican Republic. A 1969 Dominican law prohibits extradition of its citizens, although Dominican President Leonel Fernandez waived the law for the first time in August, personally ordering the extradition of two accused Dominican druggang leaders to face charges in New York. "Because of this legal prohibition, hundreds of Dominicans who commit criminal offenses in the United States find safe haven in the Dominican Republic," a State Department report concluded in March. The court documents describing the Dominican Republic's role in the drug trade are bolstered by recent State Department drugthreat assessments and testimony by DEA administrators in Washington. "With a coastline of more than 1,000 miles, a 193mile border with Haiti and its location in the Caribbean, the Dominican Republic is a convenient staging area for the outward movement of drug shipments from South America," said the State Department's most recent annual International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, which was issued in March. Although the report praised the Dominican armed forces for "excellent cooperation" with the United States in the drug fight and noted recent Dominican efforts to implement a 1995 law against money laundering, it stated that a lack of resources has left most of the coastline and border areas "open to trafficking." "The effectiveness of the law [against money laundering] remains to be seen," it added. The report went on: "There is endemic corruption among judges, prosecutors and law enforcement officers. Convictions and assets seizures were undermined by long delays and poorly trained prosecutors and judges, as well as faulty case work by law enforcement officials. . . . There are some 20,000 cases in which the [Dominican] courts have yet to render definitive judgments." Indictments Limited The report stressed, however, that the State Department has "no evidence that senior [Dominican] government officials are involved in drug distribution or money laundering. No senior government officials were indicted for drugrelated corruption in 1996." A spokesman for the Dominican Republic's embassy in Washington said in a written statement Tuesday that his government "has taken a number of measures to avoid money laundering in the country." He cited the 1995 law and additional Central Bank controls imposed a year ago on companies that remit money for Dominicans living abroad. The spokesman added that Fernandez joined President Clinton and the presidents of Central America in May to form a working group to address security and drug issues. And Fernandez's decision in August to extradite the two alleged gang leaders demonstrated the government's resolve to end the country's reputation as a drug haven, the spokesman said. The U.S. government's case against Cano is not confined to the Dominican Republic. Prosecutors assert they have evidence to prove that a large portion of his organization's alleged moneylaundering activities was much closer to homeincluding even the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Miami. The mortgage on the posh Miami Lakes property where Cano was arrested, which he bought in 1993, was held by the archdiocese, which has large land holdings. According to documents filed in the case, Cano paid off nearly $200,000 of that mortgage to the church's financialholdings company. To do so, he used a series of wire transfers and money orders that, according to DEA agent Mark Minelli's October 1996 affidavit, were "suspect." "Instead of using [his] available checking accounts, Cano paid the majority of the payments with cash used to purchase money orders and cashier's checks," stated Minelli, who headed the twoyear investigation into Cano's activities and is expected to testify toward the end of the trial. Prosecutors assert that additional drug profits were laundered through Cano's purchase of homes in the Texas border town of McAllen, where they allege he helped direct Colombian cocaine shipments through Mexico and into the United States. Underscoring the reach of the Cano case is the fact that a prominent Miami defense attorney and one of his clients, whom authorities call a major New Yorkbased cocainedistribution chief, were among the accused in the conspiracy. Attorney Michael Burnbaum, a former assistant U.S. attorney who pleaded guilty to cocaine conspiracy charges in the case earlier this month, testified against Cano on Tuesday, asserting that Cano had confided in him and provided details of his drug trade in the past. Copyright Los Angeles Times