Source: Washington Post Author: Douglas Farah, Washington Post Foreign Service Contact: http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/edit/letters/letterform.htm Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ Pubdate: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 DESPITE OBJECTIONS, CLINTON ADMINISTRATION CERTIFIES MEXICO AS DRUG-FIGHTING PARTNER The Clinton administration decided yesterday to certify Mexico as a partner in combating international drug trafficking, over the objections of the Drug Enforcement Administration and other law enforcement agencies that argued that narcotics trafficking from Mexico is increasing and official corruption remains rampant. The decision came after a debate within the administration that peaked yesterday when officials advocating certification succeeded in removing strong criticism of Mexico from planned testimony before a Senate subcommittee by Thomas A. Constantine, director of the DEA, who opposed commending Mexico's anti-drug efforts. Opponents of certification within the administration cited a secret law enforcement intelligence memorandum on the situation in Mexico, prepared last month and obtained by The Washington Post, that paints a relentlessly pessimistic assessment of the country's counternarcotics effort and dismisses many reported gains as superficial steps. Last year, in the face of congressional outrage over the certification of Mexico and serious efforts to overturn the measure, President Clinton worked out a compromise whereby the administration would set specific goals by which to judge Mexico's performance. However, critics of yesterday's decision said, virtually none of those goals had been met. The decision to certify Mexico brought bipartisan protests in Congress, with those opposing the certification claiming the administration is painting much too bright a picture of Mexico's anti-drug efforts. Because about 60 percent of the cocaine on the streets of the United States passes through Mexico, the country's cooperation is vital to any counterdrug effort. At the same time the administration certified Mexico, it did not certify Colombia, but decided to waive economic sanctions because of national security interests. Colombia has been decertified the past two years because U.S. officials believe President Ernesto Samper took $6.1 million from the Cali cocaine cartel for his 1994 presidential campaign. By March 1 every year the president must certify whether nations around the world are cooperating in combating drug trafficking. The president can deny certification to a country, triggering economic sanctions, or he can deny certification but issue a national interest wavier, eliminating the sanctions. This year, Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright said the United States had certified 22 of 30 countries. Four countries -- Nigeria, Afghanistan, Burma and Iran -- were denied certification. Colombia, Cambodia, Paraguay and Pakistan were decertified but received national interest waviers. According to knowledgeable sources, the sharpest confrontation over how to deal with Mexico came yesterday morning in a heated telephone conversation between Barry R. McCaffrey, the White House drug policy chief, and Constantine prior to the testimony of the DEA director before the Western Hemisphere subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. McCaffrey, who is a staunch supporter of increasing bilateral ties, succeeded in having some of the harsher remarks toned down or deleted as Constantine's testimony was reviewed by his office, according to the sources. That led to what one source with direct knowledge of the events called a "pretty heated discussion, with some shouting" between the two men. In a telephone interview, McCaffrey acknowledged the conversation had taken place and that there had been "more intense internal debate" over how to handle Mexico this year than in the past. However, he said the conversation was not "testy." In announcing the decision to certify Mexico, Albright said it was due to the "strong cooperation" in fighting drugs between the two nations. Attorney General Janet Reno and McCaffrey echoed the sentiment, lauding Mexico for enacting money-laundering legislation and creating new investigative units to help root out official corruption. The secret intelligence report states that "in the past year the government of Mexico has not accomplished its counternarcotics goals or succeeded in cooperation with the United States government." The document added that there were concerns about the Mexican government's prospects for success in fighting drug trafficking "due to endemic corruption, violence, and the unabated growth of the drug trafficking syndicates in Mexico." The report found that "the scope of Mexican drug trafficking has increased significantly," while the Mexican government "has arrested and prosecuted few individuals" despite the fact that the leaders of the main Mexican drug trafficking organizations are fully identified. Every major investigation in Mexico, the report said, "uncovers significant corruption of law enforcement officials that continually frustrates our effort in building cases on and apprehending the most significant drug traffickers and is the primary reason there has been no meaningful progress in drug law enforcement in Mexico." Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) blasted the decision to certify Mexico, saying that while Mexico had made "limited progress" in fighting drugs, "there remain gaping holes in its counternarcotics efforts." Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) also blasted the decision, calling it a "scam" and saying there was "less cooperation" on judicial matters and law enforcement than there was a year ago. In Mexico, the foreign ministry rejected the entire concept of certification as intrusive and hypocritical. "The government of Mexico combats drug trafficking because it considers it to be in its interest, and because of the danger that this phenomenon represents to the safety and well-being of our country," the statement said. © Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company