Source: Ft. Worth Star Telegram Author: Domingo Ramirez Jr., Star-Telegram Staff Writer Pubdate: 16 Jan 1998 Website: http://www.startext.net/ Contact: DRUGS IN USERS' SYSTEMS COULD BE BASIS FOR CHARGES Needle marks on the Hurst teen- ager's arm were among the only pieces of evidence police found when he overdosed on heroin at home in November. The unconscious teen was taken to a hospital; several hours later, he recovered and was sent home. Weeks later, police found only hesitant witnesses who reported that the same teen had bought heroin from someone in a car that pulled up to a house in Hurst. The teen injected the heroin, suffering a second overdose -- and survived again, police and witnesses say. The young man will not be charged with a crime. In most cases, police say, charges are not filed against those who overdose on heroin, because little or none of the drug is found in their possession. In rare cases, a pregnant woman can be charged because heroin or other drugs are found in her system and have endangered her fetus. But prosecutors and police say that the outbreak of reported heroin overdoses in the Metroplex, particularly in suburban cities, could change that. If the public demands that the legal system respond, they say, users could face possession charges based on drugs found in their systems, as is the case with people suspected of drunken driving. "Quite frankly, who's going to pay for something like that?" Denton County District Attorney Bruce Isaacks said. "But it's something that we could see more often down the road if public opinion wants it." The main obstacle in charging heroin users with possession or public intoxication, police say, is lack of physical evidence. Heroin users display few clear physical characteristics, police said. Laboratory results from tests on heroin users can take weeks, prosecutors say. And drug agents and police say that, in exchange for information about drug dealers, they sometimes agree not to seek possession charges against heroin users who have only a small amount of the drug. "A possession charge means an officer has to seize a usable amount," said police Cpl. Doug Blue, who investigated the Hurst teen's Jan. 4 overdose. "There may be needles and syringes lying around, but that in itself is not enough for a drug possession charge. And many times, users out here buy just enough to use and there isn't much lying around." Users can be charged with felony possession of a controlled substance/heroin when less than a gram is seized. One capsule would be enough to charge someone, a Tarrant County drug agent said. Generally, it's easier to file charges against dealers because they have sizable amounts in their possession. If convicted on a charge of possession of a controlled substance under 1 gram, a dealer could be sentenced to a maximum of two years in prison. "Possession of drug paraphernalia is an option," Blue said. "But again, officers must be able to prove what those items were used for." Heroin users can be charged with public intoxication, but that charge is difficult to prove. In most cases, officers make arrests on suspicion of public intoxication based on physical characteristicharacteristics such as slurred speech, bloodshot eyes and an unstable gait. Often, officers can smell alcohol on a person and run a breath test and not wait weeks for "Charging users based on what is in their system is a thorny issue," said Rick Curtis, an associate professor of anthropology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City. "If you did that, there would be an increase of users not going to treatment for fear of being arrested. It could also mean an increase of overdoses," said Curtis, who has researched heroin for 20 years. Bob Noble III of Fort Worth said he would prefer to see users charged based on drugs found in their systems. His grandson, Heath Noble, 22, of Bedford, died Nov. 18 of a heroin overdose. "Everybody in the loop should be held accountable," Bob Noble said. "By charging a user, that could be a tool used to find out the suppliers." It appears no one has taken a comprehensive look at overdose cases in Tarrant County. But 28 people were arrested in 1997 on heroin-related charges, according to recently released figures from the Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit. Agents also seized less than 3 pounds of heroin. In 1996, drug agents arrested 28 people and seized about 11 pounds of heroin in Tarrant County. In Northeast Tarrant County, agents seized slightly more than a quarter-pound of heroin in 1997, according to Tarrant County drug statistics. Three Northeast Tarrant residents died of heroin overdoses last year, and detectives say that two other residents may have died from overdoses. In 1996, agents confiscated less than three-quarters of a pound of heroin in Northeast Tarrant. But authorities point out that the number of heroin-related seizures in 1997 in Tarrant County ranked well below those of marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine and amphetamine. "I would project more arrests in 1998," said Bill Koos, chief prosecutor for the Tarrant County narcotics unit. "It's going to be more of a focus for law enforcement." © 1998 Star-Telegram