Source: Seattle Times 
Contact:  
Pubdate: 31 Jan 98

Medical Marijuana 

HOW CAN WE DENY RELIEF OF PAIN TO DEVASTATINGLY ILL CITIZENS?

I just finished reading "Chances slim for marijuana bill," as well as
"Medical pot advocate dies." 

I am appalled that once again the opportunity to pass legislation in our
state allowing the terminally ill, and those suffering from painful,
serious illnesses will not have a chance. 

The "marijuana bill" article indicated that many legislators as well as
opponents of the bill wanted more "clinical research" before approving the
bill. 

There are many studies currently set up to do exactly that, however, the
federal government refuses to allow these agencies to obtain the marijuana
to study. 

It appears to be a "Catch 22" at the expense of people like Ralph Seeley. 

The real crime in all of this is that the Legislature, as well as the
residents of our fair state, are allowing, no, demanding, that people like
Mr. Seeley die as criminals. 

Let's be realistic, medical use of marijuana does not, and will not lead to
use of "heavier street drugs." 

As far as any message we may be sending our children, the message should be
compassion for those suffering. 

Marijuana has, by far, less toxic side affects than prescription drugs
currently available, and it isn't vomited up like pills or liquids often are. 

Let's get past the hysteria surrounding this issue and allow individuals
like Ralph Seeley to spend their last days in peace, not having to use
every last bit of energy fighting this issue. 

The bottom line is that people with terminal illnesses, as well as those
suffering from multiple sclerosis, lupus, arthritis and glaucoma as well as
other, very serious diseases deserve the best medicine available to fight
their pain and nausea and often that medicine is marijuana. 

How can we, as a society, deny our most devastatingly ill citizens that right?

Rhonda McCormack 
Issaquah