Pubdate: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 Source: Philadelphia Inquirer (PA) Section: Opinion Contact: Website: http://www.phillynews.com/ Copyright: 1998 Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. Author: Mike Gray http://www.drugcrazy.com/ Note: Printed in the Inquirer: Mike Gray, author of Drug Crazy, is on the board of directors of Common Sense for Drug Policy. Medical marijuana initiatives shift the front of the drug war By Mike Gray The earthquake that rocked the Republican Party this month also jolted the foundations of another prominent ideological temple: the federal drug war establishment. In nine separate ballots in six states and the District of Columbia, voters ignored the advice of former presidents and high government officials, opting instead for the most significant challenge to drug war orthodoxy since President Jimmy Carter called on Congress to decriminalize marijuana in 1977. For 25 years, the government has maintained that marijuana is so dangerous we couldn't even talk about it. Now the issue is on the table, like it or not, and if it turns out that marijuana is a medicine instead of the devil's handmaiden, public support for arresting nonmedical users will begin to erode. Over the strenuous objection of politicians and lawmakers of every persuasion, voters in Alaska, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, Oregon, Washington state and the District of Columbia decided that it's OK for sick people to smoke marijuana. As if to make sure the message was understood, several of the most outspoken foes of medical marijuana had their hats handed to them on a platter. California Attorney General Dan Lungren battled tooth and nail against this idea when his fellow Californians kicked off the revolt two years ago, but he found himself cast as the heavy in a war against cancer patients. It contributed to the ultimately fatal image problems of his gubernatorial campaign. The drug warriors clearly understand this is a defining moment, but they are in a tight spot. Two years ago, Gen. Barry McCaffrey, the White House drug czar, led a frontal attack on California's medical-marijuana initiative, Proposition 215 ("Cheech and Chong medicine," he called it), but his take-no-prisoners assault apparently backfired, and it passed with room to spare. This time McCaffrey maintained a lower profile, avoiding any direct engagement with the other side. Though he lost every battle in the anti-marijuana campaign, he did manage to keep the war off the front page. The urgency of this confrontation for both sides is demonstrated by the back-door effort to keep the issue from even coming to a vote wherever possible. When medical marijuana qualified for the ballot in the District of Columbia, North Carolina Sen. Lauch Faircloth said, "I'd do anything I could to block it," and he did. But even taking the unprecedented step of forbidding local officials from counting the votes could not keep the lid on. Exit polls showed that the initiative had been approved in D.C. by a ratio of 2 to 1. So the issue will undoubtedly return to the nation's capital, but Faircloth will not. He lost to a moderate Democrat. Officials in Colorado similarly tried to prevent a vote on that state's medical-marijuana initiative. At the last minute, they decided that the measure had not qualified even though the initiative already was on the ballot. But the voters voted anyway, and medical marijuana finished with a 14-point lead. In states in which the vote was unimpeded, the spread was even more impressive. Washington state's medical-marijuana initiative not only won by a landslide, it also led in every county -- which means that every member of the Washington congressional delegation from Spokane to Cape Flattery is from a district that voted for medical marijuana. But nowhere was the battle more clearly drawn than in Arizona. Two years ago, 65 percent of Arizona voters passed a medical-marijuana initiative -- only to have it thrown back in their faces by the state legislature. Under pressure from the White House, the state nullified the will of the voters. Officials convinced themselves that the public had been duped by clever advertising. But you don't stiff 65 percent of the electorate without paying a price down the line, and this time the voters not only underscored their original intention, they also passed a second law that severely trimmed the legislature's power to do anything about it. This time there was no talk about who had been duped. The long-term problem for the drug warriors was most visible in the erosion of support in the state of Oregon. Medical marijuana wasn't the main issue there. Possession of an ounce or less has been virtually legal since 1973. But the state legislature, in a classic misreading of the public mood, decided to outlaw the weed once and for all. They placed a measure on the ballot that would have restored criminal penalities for any amount of marijuana, and it went down in flames, 2-1. The aftershocks from these votes could have profound implications for the future of the drug war itself. As author Dan Baum noted in his 1996 critique, Smoke and Mirrors, if you take marijuana out of the equation, the number of so-called serious drug users drops from 13 million to 3 million, and the drug war shrinks from a cabinet-level jihad to a sideshow. To maintain its $50-billion-a-year effort, the government must defeat medical marijuana at all costs. The current strategy is to ignore these storm clouds and hope they blow away. But if this latest referendum is a clue, they will have to stick their heads in the sand more deeply. - --- Checked-by: Richard Lake