Pubdate: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 Source: San Antonio Express-News (TX) Contact: http://www.expressnews.com/ Forum: http://data.express-news.net:2080/eshare/server?action4 Copyright: 1998 San Antonio Express-News Author: Gregg Davis Note: This adds to the string of PUB LTEs and other publicity that are the result of the efforts of members of the Drug Policy Forum of Texas. DPFT is recognized for some of its recent media activism in this week's DrugSense Weekly and Bob Ramsey's excellent OpEd "What The War On Drugs is Doing to America" will be our Feature Article this week. You may subscribe to the weekly at: http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm Or read it online at http://www.drugsense.org/news.htm CENTER DRUG DEBATE ON RATIONAL APPROACHES It's funny that Al Ronnfeldt in his Dec. 16 letter would use a non sequitur to try to refute what he alleges to be a non sequitur in Jerry Epstein's Nov. 23 letter. Epstein's arguments against the drug war cannot be reduced to something so simple as "drugs should be legalized because the government has failed to stop their sale." The favorite tactic of those who favor more of the same is to make change sound ridiculous. Because no one is forcing anyone to smoke marijuana or to use cocaine, there is a profound difference between drug sales or use and theft, assault and murder. Theft and murder are crimes against others. Drug use is a choice. Ronnfeldt says the "debate should be over whether selling drugs is immoral and harms other human beings," and, "If it is not, then they should be legalized." It's not that simple. The list of legal products and substances that are harmful and immoral is pretty long. Putting people in prison is harmful. When it is done to hundreds of thousands of people on the basis of subjective morality, it's a crime against humanity. Prohibition makes relatively cheap substances worth more than gold. It's led to the global drug cartels that are the real threat to the world. What is the price of a human life? Good question. Let's debate whether more lives could be saved by a rational drug policy or one driven by fear and emotion. Gregg Davis - --- Checked-by: Richard Lake