Source: Los Angeles Times (CA)
Contact:  http://www.latimes.com/
Pubdate: Sat, 4 Apr 1998
Author: Mark Fineman, Times Staff Writer

BLIMPS NO LONGER 'COPS' PATROLLING LATIN DRUG FLOW

Bahamas: New radar lacks visibility that helped deter South American
cocaine smuggling to U.S.

NASSAU, Bahamas -- As drug fighters, they were ugly and unwieldy -nearly
twice the size of the Goodyear blimp.

Tethered to 10,000-foot cables, the U.S. government's high-tech radar
blimps were also difficult to maintain. They were vulnerable in bad
weather. One even had to be shot down when it tore loose from its moorings
several years ago.

But their sheer bulk was also a plus: A Bahamian official likened the
unmanned airships to a highly visible cop on the beat.

U.S. and Bahamian law enforcement officials say the aerostats that searched
the sky for suspicious-looking aircraft were one of their most effective
deterrents to drug smuggling in the strategic Bahamas just off U.S.
shores--the oldest and most direct cocaine route between South America and
the United States.

Law enforcement officials here say the Pentagon's decision to yank them
down three years ago has left them without a key tool to detect and deter
the tons of U.S.-bound cocaine that are again moving through these islands.

Some of the people on the front lines of the drug war are not impressed
with the blimps' vaunted replacement, a more advanced radar system that
they say is fundamentally flawed.

The law enforcement officials are grappling with a resurgence in cocaine
traffic throughout the Caribbean, including the Bahamas--which has the
strongest U.S. counter-narcotics presence in the region. Several attribute
the increase, at least in part, to the decision to remove the three radar
blimps that were stationed here.

"The traffickers have their intelligence as well," said the Bahamas'
assistant police commissioner, Reginald Ferguson, whose government has
worked more closely with the United States in the drug fight than perhaps
any other on the globe and whose nation has been one of the war's biggest
successes. "They know the aerostats are gone, and that adds some incentive
for them to try to run through here again.

"Because we lost the aerostats, it's all pretty much guesswork," he said.

Added William Mitchell, the special agent in charge of the Drug Enforcement
Administration office in Miami, which is responsible for the Bahamas: "The
traffickers are rediscovering the Bahamas, and, in doing so, they realize
that the aerostats are no longer there."

Clearly, the lack of the radar blimps is not completely to blame.

Producers Returning to Caribbean Routes

Mitchell and other DEA officials say the resurgence of drug smuggling in
the Bahamas is part of a general trend. Colombian cocaine producers, tired
of the high cost of doing business with now-powerful Mexican drug cartels
and corrupt police, are returning to their traditional routes and allies in
the Caribbean.

What is more, a senior Pentagon official defended the aerostats' removal by
stressing that they were replaced with better technology even before they
were taken down in December 1994.

The new system, the Pentagon insists, monitors the Caribbean region more
effectively than the blimps, which monitored only a small patch of
airspace.

The new system bounces signals off the ionosphere--the outer part of
Earth's atmosphere--to give U.S. authorities operating radar screens in
Riverside County in Southern California and in Key West, Fla., a top-down
view of all aircraft moving north from South America. The Defense
Department touts the system as a great success.

"In fact, the new system is working better," said the Pentagon official,
who asked not to be named.

He cited statistics showing that only 80 to 100 proven drug flights passed
over the Caribbean in 1998, compared with as many as 400 each year before
the new system went online in April 1993; it is unclear from those numbers,
however, how many drug flights are getting through undetected.

But U.S. drug enforcement agents, radar technicians and Bahamian police
officials responsible for monitoring and curbing the drug flow here assert
that the new radar system has fallen far short of their expectations.

"I don't think it's working as they had anticipated," said Ferguson, who is
in charge of all criminal investigations in the Bahamas. "It is not always
covering the area, and it will only provide coverage if we have prior
intelligence information. . . . We know a lot of shipments are getting
through."

The reason, according to Joe Maxwell, who heads the U.S. Customs Service's
Air Interdiction Coordination Center near Riverside is that the new system
"has a very elementary flaw in it, and that is that it can't identify any
target. . . . They can see something, but they don't know if it's ducks, a
Boeing 727 or what."

It also cannot even estimate the altitude of a suspected drug aircraft, the
Pentagon concedes.

Maxwell's center at March Air Force Base is on the front lines in
Washington's high-tech war on drugs. Technicians at dozens of computer and
radar screens sort through an average of 4,000 aircraft a day that are
detected by U.S. satellites, spy planes, ground-based radar and the new,
over-the-horizon system in the Caribbean.

The blips are checked instantly against scheduled flights to identify
potential drug smugglers flying from South America toward the U.S.

Coordinates of suspicious aircraft are passed on to U.S. and Bahamian drug
agents on the ground, who then deploy aircraft and vessels to investigate.

New Radar Lacks Continuous Coverage

In a detailed analysis Maxwell sent to the Defense Department two years
ago--and recently updated--he concluded that the Pentagon's new radar
system, "by its very design and operational limitations, is not capable of
providing continuous full-area coverage with precision tracking
capabilities required for intercept and interdiction efforts."

The system, he added, was designed during the Cold War "to track and
provide course and speed of bomber-sized targets. Very few smugglers use
bomber-size general aviation to smuggle drugs."

The new radar, he added, "does not actually provide surveillance over the
entire area as advertised."

"Aerostats," Maxwell concluded, "remain by far the most cost-effective way
to meet the border radar surveillance requirement. . . . Basically, it is
the Customs Service's first line of defense against the air smuggler."

The report concluded that the new radar system costs four times as much per
hour to operate as the aerostats--$2,000 versus $500.

Maxwell, a staunch aerostat proponent who disagreed with their replacement
from the start, called their removal "probably the principal reason for the
resurgence" of trafficking in the Bahamas.

Without the aerostats, he said, the islands and their vast territorial
waters have become something of a black hole because the new system cannot
fix the precise position of an aircraft in the region.

The Defense Department official acknowledged the flaw, but he insisted that
the new radar system gives agents the ability to track suspect aircraft
from their source for the first time.

"The aerostats," he said, "didn't get anybody."

Blimps a Deterrent Even With Problems

Maxwell's analysis also echoed the view of most Bahamian police and
government officials that the aerostat's greatest asset is its imposing
presence--an argument the Pentagon official acknowledged was true.

"Aerostats are an effective deterrent whether operational or not,"
Maxwell's paper concluded. "Even if only operating at 50% availability due
to maintenance or weather-related problems, the deterrent effect is 100%."

Bahamian Tourism Minister Cornelius A. Smith agreed: "With the removal of
the balloons, the traffickers believe this area became open territory for
the transfer of drugs from the south to the United States.

"The Americans claim the aerostats became obsolete, but I believe they
served as a deterrent. They were like a policeman. You drive down the
street, and you see a policeman, you slow down. You don't know whether he's
working or not."

William Weeks, deputy director of the Bahamas' National Drug Council,
added: "Their ability to spot planes was not that good, but they added a
strong deterrence."

John Rolle, who has been the Bahamas' customs comptroller for the past 25
years, said he understood the Pentagon's technological reasons for
abandoning the aerostat network here.

"Why reach back for a Model T when you can buy a 1998 Thunderbird?" he
said. "But as far as our government is concerned, having the Model T is
better than having nothing at all."

Despite the increase in drug smuggling, Rolle added, "the trafficking
problem today still isn't as bad as it used to be. What bothers us is the
increase."

The nation boasts the most effective drug-rehabilitation and
demand-reduction program in the region, begun after cocaine traffickers
turned these islands into a drug nightmare just over a decade ago.

"When it comes to drugs, the Bahamas are one of the real success stories in
the Caribbean," a European diplomat in the region said.

"And the Drug Council has had one of the region's greatest successes in
reducing demand. No one wants to see that reversed."

Weeks attributed the National Drug Council's success to the government's
early acknowledgment of the Bahamas' drug problem and to a concerted effort
by church leaders, educators, psychiatrists and an army of volunteers who
together sharply reduced drug-addiction rates.

But such victories in the drug war are fragile, Weeks conceded. His nation,
he said, was remiss in concluding several years ago that its drug problem
was solved.

Although the smuggling resurgence has yet to show itself in increasing
addiction rates here, "what we're seeing is an increase in crime, and I
personally believe it's drug-related," he said.

With or without the aerostats, Weeks concluded: "I think we'll see drugs
coming through this country for some time to come."

Copyright Los Angeles Times