Source: USA TODAY Author: Jessica Lee of USA TODAY Pubdate: 29 April 1998 Contact: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nfront.htm SURGEON GENERAL ATTENDS TO HEALTH After 10 weeks as U.S. surgeon general, a job that has become a political lightning rod, David Satcher focused his first report as the nation's top doctor on tobacco use among minorities. But Satcher insists that he'll have little role in the coming political battle over whether to pass a sweeping tobacco bill. He says his fight is to keep the public health risks of tobacco use and other unhealthy lifestyle choices before the public. Until his Feb. 13 confirmation, Satcher, 57, was director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A physician and scientist, Satcher received medical and doctoral degrees from Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. He also served as president of Meharry Medical College in Nashville. In an interview with Jessica Lee of USA TODAY, Satcher discusses smoking, AIDS prevention, gun violence, alcohol and narcotics abuse — and even the new drug Viagra. Q: Why are smoking rates among minority youths rising more sharply than those among white teen-agers? A: They (minority youths) still smoke less than whites. We don't claim to know why. One of the conclusions in the report is that there is no single reason. Obviously we know that advertisement and promotion have a role. We also know there's a disproportionate impact of advertisements on minority communities. We say it's known to be a major factor, but it's not the only factor. Q: Will counteradvertising be where you try to make the biggest impact on reducing teen smoking? A: As surgeon general, most of my efforts are going to be on prevention, in terms of working with individuals and families. I support the push to reduce the appeal and the access of tobacco to youth very strongly. But the major thrust of the surgeon general will be promoting healthy lifestyles for children and families. Q: Are you going be part of the administration's lobbying effort to get Congress to pass a tobacco bill? A: Our role is to make sure we put into clear perspective the public health aspects of smoking, some of the causes, risk factors, results, some of the things that tend to work in terms of helping people quit. Q: But the smoking debate is at the political stage now. What will your role be? A: When people do political things, they also need input about the public health effects. They don't ask me to come up and talk about politics. They ask me to talk about the public health. Q: Tobacco companies are talking about freedom of choice. How will you respond to that? A: The public health response is that every day in this country 3,000 new teen-agers become smokers. More important than that, 80% of new smokers begin smoking before they are 18 years of age. So most people who become addicted to tobacco become addicted before they are old enough legally to purchase cigarettes. So obviously we need to do anything we can do to reduce the appeal of tobacco to teen-agers and the access. If it's illegal to purchase tobacco, then we have to make sure that we work to help see that's enforced, because when people become addicted to nicotine, it is not easy to quit. Seventy percent of people who smoke would like to quit. Yet every year only 2.5% of them are able to quit. Q: Some in Congress say there is more trouble with illegal drugs such as marijuana than with legal tobacco and that more federal funds should be devoted to eradicating drug abuse than tobacco use. How do you respond? A: Marijuana is illegal and dangerous and wrong. That's the message we have to send to teen-agers. There are a lot of things about marijuana that we don't know yet. It's wrong. Tobacco is not illegal, but it's illegal to sell tobacco to teen-agers. Therefore, there is illegality in the market. We hope that the FDA will be able to regulate it so it will be illegal to market to teen-agers, too. But teen-agers need to know that tobacco is a very dangerous drug. It is as addictive as cocaine, if not more so. Q: What about efforts to control alcohol use compared with those to control tobacco? A: Alcohol use, especially by children and youth, is very dangerous. There are many concerns we have about the role of alcohol in violence, the role of alcohol in indiscreet, inappropriate sexual behavior, the role of alcohol in motor vehicle crashes and other unintentional injuries. Q: On needle exchanges to reduce the transmission of HIV (the AIDS virus), is that issue dead now that the president has decided not to use federal funding? A: The first battle was to get a clear message out about what the science says about needle-exchange programs. And we did that. We clearly said that based on scientific studies, it is very clear that needle-exchange programs done properly in the context of a comprehensive prevention program can reduce the spread of this virus. No. 2, there's no evidence that in the process needle-exchange programs increased the use of drugs or encouraged the use of drugs. That message is very important to people in communities throughout this country. Regardless of what the federal government does about funding, that message helps local communities. In some cases it helps them to get state funds. In other cases it helps them to get private funds. But it gives them credibility because they now have a clear message about what the science says. So we're going to continue to spread the message. We have to educate people about injection drug use. We don't make decisions about the federal funding. Our role as scientists is to do what we did. Q: You've said teen pregnancy, violence and drug abuse will be your priorities. This week we've seen a 4-year-old shoot a 6-year-old. Is there some special campaign you'll press against gun violence? A: First, let me make sure you know what I mean when I say violence is a public health problem. I mean that violence is preventable and that it is susceptible to the public health approach. Clearly, the ease of access to guns to children, unsupervised access, is a major concern. I know that this has been politicized. The Centers for Disease Control had money taken away from it because the (National Rifle Association) said we were pushing gun control when we really were trying to talk about the public health approach. We stand by that. Even before Jonesboro, (Ark., where four middle-school students and a teacher were fatally shot March 24) we stood by it. I think it is unfortunate that we do not take seriously the responsibility that goes with having a gun in this country. And I don't want you to politicize it. Q: What do you think of this drug Viagra? A: Obviously, the problem of impotence is real for many couples. We have to help people deal with that. There are various ways to do that. It seems like for many men this new drug, and I think it's still early, has been effective. There's some question about whether it's not also effective for women. . . . We're learning more about this drug Viagra. We're getting great testimonies from men about how great it works. Sexual relationship is a very important part of the relationship be- tween men and women, especially in the context of marriage. Ann Landers put it best: After all these years and all our discussions, what we forget is that probably the most important sexual organ is the brain. Q: What's your best experience of the 10 weeks as surgeon general? A: The most positive experience has been the response of people to having a surgeon general. It's just been overwhelming. I have thousands of invitations to speak from all 50 states and several countries outside the United States. I get a lot of letters from people raising concerns with me. Q: What's the hardest test you've faced as surgeon general? A: The most challenging thing has been to try to maintain the integrity of the office of the surgeon general. I think the independence of that office relates to the fact that you have this direct communication with the American people and the fact that the American people rely on the surgeon general to bring them the best science and to tell them the truth. I don't want to stay away from political issues; I just don't want my tenure to be defined by politics. I want people to be able to look to me for good science and health advice. ©COPYRIGHT 1998 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc. - --- Checked-by: Richard Lake