Source: New York Times (NY) Contact: http://www.nytimes.com/ Pubdate: May 14, 1998 Author: Michael Cooper CITY IS SUED BY A WOMAN WHOSE HOME WAS RAIDED NEW YORK -- The no-knock search warrant, for a drug raid that the police carried out last June at 396 New Jersey Ave. in East New York, Brooklyn, was quite specific. "Upon reaching the second-floor landing," it said, "one turns to the left and proceeds to the gray metal door clearly marked with the letter and number '2M."' There was just one problem: There is no apartment 2M at 396 New Jersey Ave. The only apartments on the second floor are marked 2L and 2R. And both doors are red, not gray. But the family that lives in apartment 2L claims that the discrepancy did not prevent a team of police officers from breaking down its door about 8:30 a.m. on June 5. Instead of finding the heroin or handguns they were looking for, the family said, the police found only a woman and her two children, who were ages 6 and 1. The woman, Sandra Soto, 27, held a news conference Wednesday to announce that she had filed a $20 million lawsuit on Tuesday against the Police Department and the city. "They just broke down the door," she said. "I told them, 'Please, can I take the baby out of the crib?' She was screaming. They said, 'No."' But police officials said Wednesday that they were confident the officers had raided the right apartment, even if it was not the one named in the warrant and even though no drugs or contraband were found. And they questioned the timing of Ms. Soto's lawsuit, suggesting that she was trying to capitalize on recent cases in which the police have been accused of raiding the wrong apartments or carrying out improper drug raids. "It's just like a number of other cases," Police Commissioner Howard Safir said Wednesday at his weekly news conference, "that are popping up as people line up to see if they can sue the city for big dollars with attorneys who hold press conferences rather than litigate." Ms. Soto's lawyer, Susan Karten, said that Ms. Soto filed a complaint with the Civilian Complaint Review Board on the day of the raid and filed a notice of claim against the city -- which paved the way for the lawsuit -- last July. "We believe that this incident, as well as the others that followed in its wake," Ms. Karten said, "represents a continuing systemic problem within the New York City Police Department with regard to the way they confirm and verify information obtained by confidential informants in connection with drug raids." The search warrant stated that a confidential informer -- who had been a heroin user for eight years and who said he had sold the drug from time to time -- told a police officer that he had been in apartment 2M and had seen a man named Lucky "cutting heroin and placing it in plastic glassine envelopes" that were stamped with a percent symbol. The informer also said that he had seen a 9-millimeter pistol and a .38-caliber handgun in the apartment, according to the warrant. A police official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said Wednesday that the informer had proved reliable before and after the raid on New Jersey Avenue. And he said the police felt sure that they had raided the right apartment. "He went on the description of the location, rather than any letters or numbers on that door," the official said of the officer who led the raid. Ms. Soto said that she did not know anyone named Lucky. "I don't mess with anybody in the building," she said. "I'm always in the apartment." - --- Checked-by: Mike Gogulski