Source: Current History Contact: April 1998 Author: Bertil Lintner Section: Page 179 GLOBAL REACH: DRUG MONEY IN THE ASIA PACIFIC In the midst of the Asian financial crisis, at least one business is still booming: the trade in narcotics from the Golden Triangle, the main drug-producing area in the world. This year has seen not only another bumper crop of opium from the Burmese sector of the triangle-an area that also includes parts of China, Thailand, and Laos-but also new scourges from laboratories in the remote Sino-Burmese border mountains: first methamphetamines and now also the designer drug Ecstasy. In Thailand these new drugs are known as ya baa (mad medicine) and ya ee (Ecstasy medicine), and warning signs are prominently displayed through-out the country According to a recent survey by the Thai Development Research Institute, Thailand has at least 257,000 ya baa users, a number surpassing its 214,000 heroin addicts. In China the drug problem is escalating rapidly especially in the southwestern province of Yunnan, which borders Burma. According to China's National Institute on Drug Dependence, the num-ber of drug addicts in the country has grown from 70,000 in 1989 to more than half a million today - and narcotics experts consider this a conservative estimate. In Australia, New South Wales Premier Bob Carr said this February that the state's police force was doing its best to stop "an avalanche of heroin and ice" (methamphetamines) flooding into the country. The authorities in Melbourne report. of five overdoses a day, some of which are fatal. Cheap and extremely potent Southeast Asian heroin is now available for as little as $15 a hit. In the United States, most heroin seized by the police apparently originates in Latin America. But agents from the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) concede that this may only show that Southeast Asian traffickers are more skilled and cautious than their Latin American counterparts. Given the high price of drugs in the United States, and the number of addicts, it remains the most lucrative market for traffickers. But where does all the money from the sales of illicit drugs go? And how are the millions of dollars the traffickers earn from the Golden Triangle's booming drug trade "cleaned"? In Burma itself the procedure is straightforward. According to the March 1998 issue Jane's Intelligence Review, the country's military government decided as early as 1989 no longer to confiscate bank deposits and foreign currency earnings of dubious origin. It instead "opted for a whitening tax" on questionable repatriated funds levied first at 40% and since reduced to 25%. Equally significant, in early 1993, de facto legalization of the black-market exchange rate took place and narco-funds previously held in Bangkok, Singapore and Hong Kong flooded back into Myan-mar [Burma]," Jane's reported. It also quoted a retired Burmese banker as saying that 'at least 60% of all private business in Yangon [Rangoon] is drug-related." This includes new hotels, supermarkets, infrastructure projects, and other businesses that all started with money derived from the narcotics trade. However, Burma and Cambodia (another coun-try rife with lawlessness and with a thriving drug-related economy) may be the only countries left in East Asia where someone can still walk into a financial institution lugging a suitcase full of assorted banknotes and ask to open an account. Burma, a poor country with a minuscule official economy compared to any other country in the region, now has 21 local private banks and representative offices of 43 foreign banks. Apart from accepting large cash deposits, one of Burma's main domestic banks, which is owned by the Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings, the ruling military's own holding company, promises in advertisements in the Burmese press "prompt, accurate, secure, and secret" services for its clients. Cambodia's drug economy is equally blatant. According to a recent report from the Australian federal police, 19 out of 29 banks in the capital city of Phnom Penh are "suspected of money-laundering activities." The chairman of Phnom Penh's Chamber of Commerce, Teng Bunma, is barred from entering the United States because of suspected involvement in the Southeast Asian drug trade. But whether it is obscure banks in Burma and Cambodia, or more respectable financial institutions elsewhere, the essence of money laundering is the same: to convert ill-gotten cash, usually in small denominations, into a solid deposit-and then hide the origin of the funds in order to use them for legitimate purposes. HIDING THE MONEY TRAIL Money laundering is considered the world's third-largest industry after oil and foreign currency trading. It is even bigger than the actual narcotics industry since it is not only drug money that has to be laundered but also proceeds from illegal arms deals, corruption, and tax evasion. Even govern-ments launder money to cover the tracks of covert aid programs, as the United States did in the Iran-contra affair. But according to the United Nations International Drug Control Program, most dirty money, or an estimated $500 billion to $750 billion annually, comes from the drug trade. A 1997 study by economists at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn Uni-versity estimates that Thailand-which, although it is not a major drug producer, remains a regional center for banking and finance-attracts up to $31 billion in illegal money each year from narcotics, prostitution, gambling, and smuggling. In the Asia-Pacific region, the most extensive research into money laundering has been con-ducted in Australia. John Walker Consulting Ser-vices in Sydney, which has investigated money laundering for the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (AUSTRAG), the police body that provides the government with financial intelligence, divides the process into three phases: *Placement: the physical disposal of the bulk cash profits that are the result of criminal activity; *Layering: the creation of layers of complex financial transactions such as wire transfers to separate the proceeds from their illicit sources; *Integration: the provision of pseudolegitimate explanations for the appearance of wealth by making investments in the licit economy. According to the Australian federal police, some-where between $600 million and $3 billion a year are laundered in Australia to pay for hotels, restau-rants, real estate deals, luxury homes, or simply extravagant lifestyles. To raise funds for such pur-poses, many prominent, otherwise respectable busi-nesspeople may invest in a major drug deal. The financiers will never get close to the actual drugs; they hire smugglers and street gangs to do the dirty work. Once the drugs have been brought in from South-east Asia and sold in Sydney or Melbourne, the trick is to get the money out of Australia and have it transferred back again disguised as profits from a lucrative business in, for example, Hong Kong or Thailand. Drug dealers usually end up with lots of small cash, which may be smuggled out in bulk, hidden in suitcases or even, as senior Australian fed-eral police officers testify inside machinery An easier and less risky method, police sources say, is "smurfing." This involves a large number of people who visit various banks with cash, where they wire or purchase small drafts just below the $6,400 ($10,000 Australian) reporting threshold, which are then sent to accounts in Bangkok and Hong Kong. Bank drafts in the $3,200-$5,800 range have also become popular among some money launderers, according to police sources. Inside Asia, the underground Chinese banking system also facilitates the movement of money from country to country According to a document from the DEA, "through the underground banking system, heroin traffickers can transfer $500,000 from Hong Kong to Bangkok within hours simply by visiting a gold shop in Hong Kong's Western Market." From Bangkok the money can be wired to the northwestern Thai city of Chiang Mai, received by the heroin supplier's organization, and forwarded through another network to Burma to buy more drugs and to finance trafficking operations. Profits from the trade can be sent the other way, via the gold shops in Yawarat, the heart of Bangkok's Chinatown. When the cash or remittances eventually reach Hong Kong-still the favorite destination for dirty money-they have to be placed safely in one of the territory's 177 international banks or 200 finance companies. The lack of foreign currency controls in Hong Kong once facilitated the movement of illicit funds through the territory, but tighter rules that were put into place before the handover to China forced money launderers to use more roundabout methods. The most popular is to take the hydrofoil to Macau, change cash or small bank drafts into gambling chips in one of the territory's casinos, spend a few at the gaming tables, and then convert most of them back into a "clean" check. The casino will issue an accompanying document stating that the money had been won at the casino. A source close to the scene in Macau claims that some casino man-agers specialize in providing such ser-vices for money launderers, who have to pay a commission. "But such minor expenses are part of the busi-ness," said the source. The check can then be deposited legally in any Hong Kong bank and, if any questions are raised, the casino manager will testify that his client had had an unusually lucky day at the gaming table. The result is that money trails become even harder to follow since casinos anywhere are ideal for laundering and moving drug money Police sources say that most casinos are linked to a world-wide credit system through which gambling profits or credits can be deposited at, for example, a casino in Las Vegas and later collected in Macau-and vice versa-without going through an established bank. "Billions of dollars are being moved around the world in this manner and there's no way we can check it," an Australian police source said. THE NEW CAYMAN ISLANDS Once the cleaned-up cash has entered the official banking system, it can be moved quickly into a variety of financial instruments and accounts. It is in this context that law enforcement agencies are taking a keen interest in a string of new "tax havens" that have been established in the Pacific, paralleling those in the Cayman Islands and simi-lar "financial centers" in the Caribbean. The South Pacific island states have little arable land, few natural resources, and small populations. Unable to develop industry and agriculture, their greatest strength lies in their proximity to the much richer East Asian economies. Many have sold fish-ing licenses to fleets from Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and the United States. Tonga, Kiribati, and the Marshall Islands have sold passports, mostly to Hong Kong Chinese, and Kiribati has mar-keted its prime location near the equator to sell satellite launch and tracking services. But the big money seems to be in providing tax-free financial services ~ the Asia-Pacific region. The established South Pacific tax haven is Vanuatu (formerly the Anglo-French condominium of the New Hebrides), whose tiny, one-street capital, Port Vila, abounds with nearly 80 banks, 2,000 shell companies, and numerous insurance agents, accountants, and lawyers.[1] Although most of these businesses are legitimate, Australian officials believe that millions of dollars worth of dirty money, including drug money, is placed in the banks of Vanuatu and other Pacific tax havens through trusts and shell companies, protected by a web of impen-etrable laws. Vanuatu is in the same time zone as East Asia, has no reciprocal-tax agreement with any other country, and considers breach of confidentiality a criminal act. Further, what attracts money to cen-ters such as Vanuatu is not their status as tax havens. According to AUSTRAC's Tim Morris, an expert on money laundering, "It is not the absence of taxes, or even the ability to walk into a bank with a suitcase full of cash with no questions asked, that makes an offshore banking center attractive. It's the strict bank secrecy the inability of any government to investigate the source of unusual wealth parked in places like that." Concerns about Vanuatu's secretive banking laws were highlighted in 1996 by a scandal in Indonesia surrounding Vanuatu-incorporated Dragon Bank. The bank, headquartered in a small downstairs room in a Port Vila office building, had announced plans for a 101-story skyscraper in Jakarta, a $4 bil-lion telecommunications venture (also in Indone-sia), and an $80 million property project on the Malaysian island of Langkawi. But in June 1996 government officials shut down Dragon Bank in Indonesia for operating without a banking license. In January 1997, the government in Port Vila also revoked its banking license in Vanuatu. Although the vast majority of Vanuatu's banks are owned by ethnic Chinese interests from Indone-sia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China, dirty money from other parts of the world has also ended up there. Alarm bells rang at AUSTRAC's Sydney head-quarters two years ago when it was discovered that seven Russian banks had shown interest in opening representative offices in Vanuatu. The concern reflects the state of Russia's banking system as much as Vanuatu's. The DEA has estimated that of nearly 2,000 Russian commercial banks, at least a quarter are owned by major criminal organizations. The South Pacific seems to have first attracted the interest of Russian bankers two years ago when the United States government increased pressure on financial centers in the Caribbean. In February 1996, five of the six banks in Antigua were closed by the island's authorities. All were suspected of hav-ing laundered dirty money for the Russian mafia. Only one bank in Vanuatu has been positively identified as Russian-owned: Prok Bank, whose name means "profit" in Russian. While there is no suggestion that Prok Bank has engaged in any illegal activities, law enforcement officials believe several more Russian banks are operating in Vanuatu under phony names. Nauru, Western Samoa, the Cook Islands, Niue, and the Marshall Islands also provide offshore ser-vices for foreign companies and banks. Tiny Niue, a territory associated with New Zealand, has only 2,000 inhabitants and is eagerly protecting its financial center, which is the island's major source of income. Offshore banking services reported receipts of $118,000 for 1995-1996, but the Audit Office of New Zealand has complained that it continues to be refused access to records of offshore banking transactions. In 1997, about 200 companies were registered in Niue, producing about $227,000 for the territory The Trust Company of the Marshall Islands (a former United States dependency) has just opened a new headquarters to cope with expanded business with offshore corporations. Several ethnic Chinese who have acquired Marshall Islands citizen-ship are known to have been involved in the smuggling of illegal aliens from China to the United States. Long a haunt of buccaneers, beachcombers, and missionaries, the South Pacific is becoming a new kind of paradise - for crooks and money launderers flocking to take advantage of the islands' secretive financial regimes as well as the naivete of many of the leaders of these young and poor island states. In theory all members of the South Pacific Forum, the island states' regional body, are pledged to respect the 1992 Honiara Declaration (named after the capital of the Solomon Islands, where the meeting was held), which encourages them to outlaw money laundering. In reality they have neither the funds nor the institutions to carry this out. In only one case has laundered drug money been seized in Vanuatu. This came after the United States provided hard evidence that money from drug sales in America had been transferred to Australia, and then into offshore trusts in Vanuatu. The seizure took place in March 1995, and the amount, $1.5 million, was forfeited to the Vanuatu government following a United States Supreme Court order. It was a small and solitary victory for law enforcement. MONEY IS MONEY With the drug trade booming in East Asia and the entire region in financial turmoil - and in the case of Indonesia, also political uncertainty - the need to transfer "hot" money to safer jurisdictions has become even more urgent than before. Illegal immigration from China, and the related trade in false and real foreign passports, is also a multimillion-dollar business. Law enforcement agencies face the herculean task of trying to stem this traffic in people, drugs, and money; the degree of their success depends almost entirely on the coopera-tion they receive from the financial sector, particularly the submission of suspect transaction reports. But do bankers, lawyers, and accountants from Bangkok, Rangoon, Phnom Penh, and Moscow to Hong Kong, Singapore, Jakarta, Port Vila, Sydney and San Francisco know what kind of money they are handling? The weakness of the entire system, and all the players it involves, was best summed up by the infamous American-Sicilian gangster Charlie "Lucky" Luciano: "There's no such thing as good monev or bad monev. There's just money." **** [1] A shell company is a business entity that is registered in, for example, Vanuatu, the British Virgin Islands, and the Cayrnan Islands. However, the company does not have a proper office, has no staff, and does not produce anything. The address could be a solicitor's office in Port Vila, and the purpose of the company is solely to be a conduit for dirty money. - --- Checked-by: Mike Gogulski