Source: The Examiner (Ireland) Contact: 30 Jul 1998 Author: Brian Carroll, Security Correspondent PROPOSED PRIVACY LAWS CHANGES WOULD HIT FIGHT AGAINST CRIME GARDAI working undercover on drugs, crime or terrorist operations could soon face serious limitations on their work if proposed changes to the privacy laws are effected by the Dept. of Justice. The Law Reform Commission has recommended a new set of civil and criminal offences to protect against invasion of privacy using surveillance technology. The report could also have significant ramifications for the media as it suggests a number of legal curbs on their work, while providing for the defence of public interest. The Commission recommends gardai acquire surveillance warrants from the District Court for State surveillance of private places. Unlike phone-tapping, where gardai are required to get prior authorisation, gardai do have to get a warrant at present to carry out surveillance. A Garda spokesman refused to comment on the proposal. However, senior officers said the proposals, if implemented into law, would have serious implications for undercover operations, in particular, those of the Garda National Drugs Unit and Special Branch. In a recommendation which could have implications for the media, the Commission proposes giving individuals the right to sue for the abuse of any material obtained by way of privacy-invasive surveillance through disclosure, dissemination or publication. The media will be entitled to claim public interest as a defence. However, the Law Reform Commission does not believe that the media should be allowed self-regulation in this area and recommends giving the courts discretionary powers to decide what is in the public interest. The National Union of Journalists welcomed the public interest defence, but expressed reservations about the proposal to remove self-regulation and give judges discretionary power over the media. On the civil front, the Commission also proposes a new tort of harassment, for which there are no defences. It also recommends a civil tort directed against any form of surveillance that "violates an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy". Certain defences will allow private investigators to claim the defence of a person's rights as a legitimate reason for the surveillance. On the criminal front, the Law Reform Commission proposes making it an offence to plant a surveillance device in a private dwelling or use such a device to spy on a private dwelling; to trespass on a private dwelling with a view to obtaining personal information; or to use a surveillance device to spy on a private conversation. A number of defences would apply including lawful authority, the detection or prevention of crime by gardai, and the protection of one's own legitimate rights, or the protection of others. - --- Checked-by: Mike Gogulski