Source: Vancouver Sun (Canada) Contact: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 Author: Pete McMartin DRUG-FIGHTING MD DOESN'T MOLLYCODDLE "Social work is the last refuge of the curious notion that man is basically good ... Its proponents, in their boundless good nature, excuse the aberrants from all responsibility for their actions. It's never the fault of the offender, always his environment: his home, the consumer society, the media ... At a stroke we can rid the world of crime, since there are now no criminals, only clients." -- Civil War: From L.A. to Bosnia, by Hans Magnus Enzensberger. The above quote was provided to me by Dr. Douglas Coleman, a 47-year- old doctor who, in his work at an addiction clinic in New Westminster, subscribes to the unfashionable notions of abstinence and personal culpability when it comes to treatment. He does not mollycoddle. He encourages, and expects, his clients to stay off drugs. He does not try merely to lessen their cravings; he does not provide them with sociological alibis to remove their sense of personal responsibility. He tells them to stop. He tries to cure them. Sometimes, he does cure them. Even so, Coleman warned, the battles won against drug addiction are slow, hard fought and long in coming. There are no panaceas. You win them one at a time. "Sometimes I balk at using the word 'cure,' " he said. "I see lots of patients over and over again trying to quit. But at least they're trying." This school of thought -- that puts the onus of responsibility on the addict, that sees addiction as a medical problem rather than a legal and sociological one -- has put Coleman, and many Lower Mainland medical practitioners like him, on the Out List when it comes to the provincial government's latest philosophy on the drug problem. That philosophy, which goes by the euphemistic name of "harm reduction," accepts the addict's condition as a constant, and then tries to lessen the harm addicts can do to themselves and the collateral damage they do against society in trying to maintain their habits. Thus we see the first concrete suggestions from a Vancouver/Richmond health board committee for "safe injection sites" for the Downtown Eastside. Give the junkies a controlled environment so they don't kill themselves or somebody else in the process. Sounds neat and reasonable enough, Coleman said, except for a few things. One, it will legitimize addiction, which is all right if you see addicts as disposable commodities, but is troubling if you, like Coleman, see them as human beings who need help. Two, it will ghettoize the drug and crime culture in the Downtown Eastside even more than it is now, which will attract a critical mass of addicts, which will solidify into a self-sustaining drug and crime economy, which will perpetuate the hundreds of millions of tax dollars in social services spent in the Downtown Eastside every year. "Recovery won't happen while they're down in the Downtown Eastside," he said. Three, this laissez-faire, anything-goes form of harm reduction, Coleman said, (and there are lesser forms of harm reduction Coleman supports) came into being in B.C. with no input from the local frontline medical addiction community. Rather, it was formulated by social engineers like psychologists, sociologists and medical health officers without any clinical experience. Coleman's offers to provide training and direction, he said, were ignored, along with the offers from other addiction treatment doctors. Shut out by policy makers, he and the three other doctors in the clinic have been reduced to asking social agencies in the Downtown Eastside in regular contact with addicts to refer them to his clinic. "We, as physicians, have let the appropriate people in the Downtown Eastside know that we will maintain every effort we can to move addicts into recovery programs and out of the Downtown Eastside." And so how many have they sent his way? "They haven't referred anybody to us," Coleman said. "No one." Pete McMartin can be reached at or at 605-2905. - --- Checked-by: Don Beck