Pubdate: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 Source: San Francisco Chronicle (CA) Contact: http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/ Page: 2 Author: Barbara Crossette AMNESTY FINDS 'WIDESPREAD PATTERN' OF U.S. RIGHTS VIOLATIONS Amnesty International, in its first campaign directed at any Western nation, intends to publish a harsh report on the United States on Tuesday, saying U.S. police forces and criminal and legal systems have "a persistent and widespread pattern of human rights violations." Amnesty International, the 37-year-old human rights organization based in London, plans to make its report the focus of a yearlong effort in more than 100 countries and in international bodies like the United Nations to protest what it calls a U.S. failure "to deliver the fundamental promise of rights for all." The report is part of a growing effort among human rights organizations to seek "balance" in reporting by looking at industrialized as well as developing nations. The Clinton administration has encouraged that trend more than its predecessors, welcoming monitors from the U.N. Human Rights Commission in the face of sharp criticism from some members of Congress. But U.S. officials and U.S human rights groups that are also often critical have had mixed reactions to some international reports, describing some as selective or lacking in nuance and context and often deliberately excluding background information on civil rights protections in the United States. The new Amnesty report is bound to be among the most controversial of the recent surveys. Officials in New York, which figures prominently, and in Washington declined to comment because they had not seen the report. The 150-page report pulls together widely reported cases of abuses around the United States and incorporates the work of U.S. advocacy groups and Amnesty investigations. Without responses from U.S. officials, it concludes with this statement: "Across the country thousands of people are subjected to sustained and deliberate brutality at the hands of police officers. Cruel, degrading and sometimes life-threatening methods of constraint continue to be a feature of the U.S. criminal justice system." The report also condemns what is sees as a general failure to punish offending officials. It criticizes the treatment of people who seek asylum by U.S. immigration authorities and calls, as Amnesty has done in the past, for the abolition of the death penalty, which the report says is "often enacted in vengeance, applied in an arbitrary manner, subject to bias because of the defendant's race or economic status, or driven by the political ambitions of those who oppose it." Pierre Sane, a development expert from Senegal who has been secretary general of Amnesty International for six years, said in an interview that the United States was chosen as the first Western target because human rights conditions were deteriorating. "We felt it was ironic that the most powerful country in the world uses international human rights laws to criticize others," Sane said, "but does not apply the same standards at home." Sane does not deny that the report, some of it in strong, often polemical language, seems to hold government officials more responsible for violations than the individuals who exceed their authority in committing abuses. "Responsibility to uphold human rights lays with the federal government, lays with the Congress, lays with authorities in the different states," he said. "I think that what our research has found is a generalized failure of the systems of monitoring, of accountability for the police, for the prison guards, for immigration officials." The report criticizes the United States for failing to sign international rights conventions, among them the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Sane said it was not relevant that some countries that had signed the convention did not act against abuses of children, as in southern Asia, where more than 50 million children are thought to be forced to work, many of them in bonded labor. "The covenant is extremely important, because the covenant represents a consensus of all nations," he said. "That a country does not respect its laws once it becomes part of the covenant is another problem." Sane said the purpose of the Amnesty campaign against the United States was "to raise awareness of the need to take action." "I think in terms of the severity of what is happening in the U.S., more or less people are aware," Sane said. "They are aware that in the States police can be brutal. They're aware that prisons are not the best place to be in. But what we are concerned with is the lack of action and the complacency. "It seems to me that the international community, in terms of standards, is moving really ahead of the standards obtained in the United States today." - --- Checked-by: Mike Gogulski