Pubdate: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 Source: ABC News - Nightline Contact: http://204.202.137.114/onair/nightline/email.html Website: http://www.abcnews.go.com/onair/nightline/transcripts/nl990310_trans.html Copyright: 1998 ABCNEWS and Starwave Corporation. Note: This is an unedited, uncorrected transcript. NIGHTLINE, GETTING STRAIGHT, PART I COKIE ROBERTS This country's been waging a war on drugs for decades now and so far we don't seem to be winning it. Over the next three nights, Nightline will be examining the nation's drug policy based on a critical assessment by Michael Massing. His book, called The Fix, draws on a 1994 report by the Rand Corporation which found drug treatment 10 times more effective than the interdiction of drugs at the borders. The figures for this year's budget, two thirds of our federal drug dollars will go to law enforcement, one third to treatment. Joining us later to give us his status report on the drug war, General Barry McCaffrey, the Clinton administration's point man on drugs. But first, Nightline's Dave Marash with the story of a possible breakthrough in the treatment of the nation's more than three and a half million cocaine addicts. DAVE MARASH, ABCNEWS (VO) Dr. Donald Landry of Columbia University's College of Physicians and Surgeons hardly looks like a revolutionary. But a new enzyme called a catalytic antibody that he has developed in work commissioned by the federal drug czar's office could revolutionize treatment for cocaine addiction. DR. DONALD LANDRY Well, this is the molecular structure of cocaine and the antibody first binds it. DAVE MARASH (VO) Landry diagrammed what happens in the bloodstream ... DR. DONALD LANDRY And then it has molecular machinery to clip this spot. DAVE MARASH (VO) When his antibody attacks and breaks apart molecules of cocaine before they can get to the brain and turns cocaine into two harmless substances. DR. DONALD LANDRY And so now we have materials that are inactive. They are not addictive, they are not toxic. DAVE MARASH (VO) The Landry antibody has been tested on rats and mice and has nullified the effects of what should have been a lethal overdose of cocaine. DR DONALD LANDRY In a model of cocaine overdose, we can give a dose of cocaine that should kill 90 percent of the animals. If the animals are pretreated with the antibody, 100 percent live. DAVE MARASH (VO) Even more exciting, says Dr Landry, is what happened when the antibody was used to preempt long-term use of cocaine. DR. DONALD LANDRY In terms of a model of addiction, when we pre-treat with the antibody, animals that used cocaine now can't tell the difference between cocaine and salt water and the hope is that giving an antibody that can persist in the circulation for weeks at a time we might make that person relatively immune to the effects of cocaine. DAVE MARASH (VO) So far, tests of Landry's antibody have kept rodents off cocaine for up to 30 days, enough time to create a window of opportunity for addicted people to undergo rehabilitation and therapy to break their bad habits and move towards sobriety. Still to come, tests on monkeys and perhaps within two years, on humans. If those tests succeed, the results for treatment of cocaine could be improved dramatically. (on camera) The problem is too few addicts are getting treatment. The latest federal survey showed just one addict in four desiring treatment actually getting it, which critics blame on a federal drug fighting budget that spends twice as much on cutting drug supplies as it does on controlling demand by treating addicted people. MICHAEL MASSING I think we have our priorities backward. DAVE MARASH (VO) Author Michael Massing recently published The Fix, a history and analysis of federal drug policy since the 1960s. MICHAEL MASSING The Rand Corporation did a study several years ago in which they measure dollar for dollar the effectiveness of treatment, law enforcement, border interdiction and programs abroad in Latin America to try to reduce cocaine consumption and they found that every dollar you put in treatment was seven times more effective than law enforcement, 10 times more effective than interdiction and 23 times more effective than international programs. DAVE MARASH (VO) What Massing prescribes is going back to the policies of the Nixon administration, when Dr. Jerome Jaffe ran the war against drugs. MICHAEL MASSING Basically they understood that the key to having an effective drug policy was making treatment available to addicts at the point when they want help. GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY This was the first time that we said the federal government will assume responsibility for treatment. DAVE MARASH (VO) When Jaffe was President Nixon's drug czar, he put two thirds of the federal anti-drug budget into treatment. GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY We wrote contracts to sort of buy up the waiting lists. When there were waiting lists we said how much would it cost for you to expand enough to admit all of those people? And we negotiated those costs and wrote the checks and expanded the waiting lists disappeared. DAVE MARASH (VO) The results? GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY If you're asking what was the impact of the treatment itself, well, there were substantial declines in the measures of the adverse effects of heroin use. Overdose deaths went down. New cases of hepatitis went down. There were some reports that in some places crime went down. DAVE MARASH (VO) The bottom line, according to Jaffe ... GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY Every additional dollar spent on treatment more than pays for itself in terms of reduced medical complications, reduced crime and general increased employment, even if you don't count the reduction of human suffering that's associated with it. DAVE MARASH The Clinton administration's latest budget for fighting narcotics hues to the formula of the past 15 years. Roughly twice as much will go for slash and burn raids in Mexico and Peru, for border interdiction and domestic police work as for drug treatment. In fact, over the first seven years of the Clinton administration, the share of drug control money spent for demand reduction has actually fallen slightly. COKIE ROBERTS For ex-addicts, the hard road to recovery comes easier when they're in treatment programs. We'll have more on that when Dave Marash comes back with his report in a moment. (Commercial Break) DONNA After spending 11 days in detox, I came here and I wasn't still, physically I was, you know, detoxed, but I still, you know, had trouble seeing and I couldn't sleep and it was, I was in a nightmare. DAVE MARASH (VO) Donna is one of a group of recovering addicts we met at the Smithers Treatment Center, one of New York City's best known facilities, the place Truman Capote came to fight his addictions, the place that also started baseball stars Darryl Strawberry and Doc Gooden on their roads to recovery. Seven years ago, when Donna started treatment, 11 days in detox wasn't unusual. Today, it's almost unheard of. And so is this. DONNA I was fortunate enough to get a 28 day program here. A lot of people now aren't able to get 28 days. DAVE MARASH (VO) No, they aren't. Instead, says Smithers' director of administration, most patients now do rehabilitation in ... GERALD HOROWITZ, THE SMITHERS CENTER Between 12 and 18 days and that's when people are able to access the treatment at all. The commercial insurance, for example, is much more reticent to put anybody into an impatient program as opposed to providing outpatient benefits for the individual. DAVE MARASH (VO) Which worries many recovering addicts because they insist recovery is a long, hard process. EDUARDO Twenty-eight days inpatient was just very, very beginning cause my treatment was over six months. I did one month in here and then five months outpatient and it is an ongoing process. JIM When an individual is so completely addicted to a substance, alcohol, heroin, cocaine, it takes over that person's life and all the person's decisions, all his planning, all his activities in the course of the day have to be factored around getting, using, recovering and getting again. DAVE MARASH (VO) There's so much to replace, so much to overcome, so much to get done in rehabilitation until slowly over time new, better obligations fill in the structures of everyday life. Jay, as we'll call him, asked us not to show his face. JAY I have structure in my life. I, you know, have a routine to my life, you know? I have a dog. I raise fish. I raise plants. I, you know, I have a girlfriend. I have, you know, I have a lot of things in my life that I didn't have before and that's pretty much what tells me that it's working for me. DAVE MARASH (VO) So are these recovering addicts right? Are the cutbacks in drug treatment dictated by HMOs and insurance companies undermining its success? The truth is, says Dr Alexander DeLuca, (ph) we don't know. DR ALEXANDER DELUCA The risks would be that there would be, perhaps, a higher relapse rate or a lower engagement in treatment rate. To my knowledge, that has not been demonstrated. RESEARCHER They plug this into any phone, any phone socket in the wall and they hit send. DAVE MARASH (VO) If there is a relationship between time spent in treatment and success or failure, we should know more about it soon through another project funded by the drug czar's office now underway at the Treatment Research Institute of the University of Pennsylvania. Data pours in around the clock from computers placed in dozens of treatment centers and hospitals in five cities. Already, some 2,000 addicts' case histories are on file. DR. HARBERT KLEBER, NATIONAL CENTER ADDICTION & SUBSTANCE ABUSE We've been following them since they entered treatment and right now we're in the one year follow-up phase. DAVE MARASH (VO) This database allows drug treatment facilities to tailor their programs to ever changing needs, defined in part by what drugs are being most abused right now. DR HARBERT KLEBER You need to know what you're dealing with. In the mid-'80s, the big problem was cocaine. Increasingly in the '90s, the problem is becoming heroin again, but out of the corner of our eye we're keeping a watch out for methamphetamine, which is moving across the country from the west coast. DAVE MARASH (VO) Soon, there will be 25 cities and eventually plans call for a national network acquiring and distributing real time information on drug treatment immediately available to every participating drug treatment provider. DR HARBERT KLEBER And that provider will be able to look and see what patient characteristics and what treatment characteristics have done best together. DAVE MARASH (VO) This project should benefit addicts, treatment facilities and, says Dr Kleber, above all, policymakers. DR HARBERT KLEBER Policy should be driven by science. What we can do with these studies is show that treatment can work, that it can be cost effective, that a dollar spent on treatment can save money elsewhere. DAVE MARASH The debate whether you get more bang for your bucks through cutting off supplies or moderating demand is an old one. But soon, as that data piles up from around the country, the decisions on it should be better informed than ever. I'm Dave Marash for Nightline in Washington. COKIE ROBERTS When we come back, I'll talk with General Barry McCaffrey, director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. (Commercial Break) COKIE ROBERTS Joining me here in Washington is General Barry McCaffrey, director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, what we commonly call the drug czar. Thank you for being with us, General McCaffrey. Now, that interesting report Dave Marash showed us about a possible cocaine blocker was from a drug conference, a conference on cutting edge technologies that you sponsored today. What do you think about that cocaine blocker? BARRY MCCAFFREY, DIRECTOR NATIONAL OFFICE DRUG CONTROL POLICY Well, we're very encouraged. You know, Don Landry is a brilliant guy. We brought together yesterday, today and tomorrow more than 400 scientists from all over the country. About 100 scientific papers were presented and among possibly the most important a work by Don Landry, who's taken a very unusual and creative approach to using the bloodstream to block cocaine. We're also finding another fellow, Dr. Mike Cuhard, (ph) Emory University, who's working against cocaine receptors in the brain itself. So there's great promise to be able to finally give a tool to American medicine to deal with 3.6 million addicted Americans. We desperately need something in the field in the hands of drug treatment. COKIE ROBERTS That's 3.6 million cocaine addicts? GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY Yeah, exactly. COKIE ROBERTS All right, and General, though, that, of course, assumes that these people are getting to treatment in order to be able to receive any new technologies or treatments and you saw Dave Marash's report saying that not enough people are getting to treatment, that the numbers are too much enforcement, too little treatment. GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY Well, I clearly agree there isn't enough treatment. You know, we've put on almost a billion dollar increase in the treatment since FY'96 - an increase of 26 percent in federal dollars. I might add, thanks to the cooperation of bipartisan support in Congress, we've increased drug prevention funding by 53 percent. So your viewers shouldn't miss the point that we actually get the point that this strategy simply must be based on prevention of drug abuse by adolescents and treatment of the four million addicted. COKIE ROBERTS Well, then why are the numbers so lopsided? Why is it two thirds money for enforcement, interdiction, etc., and one third for treatment and treatment of demand? GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY Well, it's sort of a screwy way of counting it, to be honest. The drug budget has gone from $13.5 billion in FY'96 to $17.8 billion in the year 2000 and that has disproportionately been invested in treatment and prevention. I think the bigger problem, Cokie, is we simply lack health parity for drug treatment in the private sector. And in addition, we've done an inadequate job of providing drug treatment for those behind bars, 1.8 million Americans behind bars, half of 'em have a compulsive drug using problem. COKIE ROBERTS Well, let's talk about that for a minute because we just heard one of these experts say that this should be policy by science. That's something you've said several times. GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY Oh, absolutely. COKIE ROBERTS It shouldn't be - but we do have a Congress which has year in and year out passed crime bills which say that drug offenders must go to prison, serve minimum sentences and the prisons are getting filled up with these people. Women's prisons are being built by the thousands. What, I mean is this policy by science? GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY Well, I think Attorney General Reno and Donna Shalala and I all basically agreed you can't get at the problem of bad drug policy simply by arresting people and locking them up. You've got to have treatment available and that means not only prison based but also follow on community oversight. That community oversight can partially be based on the best drug program in the world, which is Alcoholics Anonymous and NA. But still, we've got to put our money where our mouth is and I believe the administration is now doing that with increasing support by Congress. COKIE ROBERTS What is the evidence of that when we see this new budget still, as I say, with these lopsided numbers? GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY Well, it's $3.6 billion, Cokie. We've never had that much money in drug treatment in our history and in addition we've got Janet Reno with a serious amount of money behind the drug court program. Three years ago there were 12 drug courts. Today there are almost 500 either online or coming online. I believe before we walk out of this, these offices, they'll be more than a thousand. So we are moving in the right direction. But let me tell you what the problems are. We've got to have some form of drug treatment health parity in the health insurance business and we've got to more effectively get at the problem of closing this treatment gap, particularly in the criminal justice system. COKIE ROBERTS The, but I know that there are problems in the private sector, but in the public sector it seems to me we've gone through cycles here and in the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations you went to these mandated minimums, prison sentences, enforcement, all the stuff that we're seeing now. Then in the Nixon administration, more to treatment ,we saw the Nixon drug czar earlier in the broadcast saying treatment was the answer, and then back to enforcement. Is, do we just not get the message? What's the problem? GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY Well, again, let me say, to put it in perspective, there's never been more federal dollars in treatment ever. It's gone up enormously just in the last four years. In addition, I would tell you the drug addiction problem is bigger. There are 4.1 million Americans who are compulsive drug users, another 10 million chronic alcoholics. So the problem is immense. The dimensions of our response are inadequate. But I think we are moving in the right direction. We'll never get there, though, just with federal funding. We're going to have to have some form of health insurance parity for drug treatment. COKIE ROBERTS And what is the administration doing to get there? GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY Well, we're putting a tremendous amount of creativity into trying to link drug treatment systems with the criminal justice system. That's the beginning. It's called Break The Cycle. It's a Janet Reno concept. It says if you're arrested, and you will be if you end up as a compulsive drug user, you're going to be in mandated drug treatment. That's one piece of the puzzle. I think the second one is we've done a lot of analysis. We believe it's probably the case that the health insurance industry will save money under smart management if we provide drug treatment instead of waiting until these people show up in hospital emergency rooms or traffic accidents or behind bars. COKIE ROBERTS General, we only have a couple of seconds left, but do you see any evidence that they are willing to go that route? Prevention's been a tough one to sell to the health maintenance people and the health insurance people. GEN. BARRY MCCAFFREY Yeah, well, thankfully we've gotten a lot of support out of people like Senator Campbell and Orrin Hatch and Joe Biden and in the House by Denny Hastert, Rob Portman and Sandy Levin. So I think there's an increasing number of congressmen who get the point. There's four million chronic addicts and we simply have to get effective drug treatment into place. COKIE ROBERTS Thanks so much, General Barry McCaffrey. - --- MAP posted-by: Derek Rea