Pubdate: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 Source: Charlotte Observer (NC) Copyright: 1999 The Charlotte Observer Contact: http://www.charlotte.com/observer/ Author: Tony Mecia, Staff Writer, CITY SETTLES FIREFIGHTER'S SUIT IN CONTROVERSIAL DRUG CASE GASTONIA -- The city says former Gastonia firefighter Karen Goff gave police the key to her locker in 1997, where they found a powder that tested positive for cocaine. Goff's lawyers say the search was forced and that there was no test -- and no cocaine. In those drastically different versions, found in the court documents of the lawsuit Goff filed last year, both sides insist they're right. But neither will be vindicated by a jury. Tuesday, Goff's lawyers and the lawyer for the city and its insurance company agreed to settle the case for $30,000. Of that, the city owes $10,000, the amount of its insurance deductible. It's the second time in five years that Gastonia has settled a complaint against it. "We're pleased that we're able to compensate Karen, but nothing in the world can compensate her for what she lost," said Tom Hunn, one of Goff's lawyers. Her reputation suffered because of the false charges, Hunn said. Goff, who now works as an electrician in Charlotte, was unavailable Wednesday. Dennis Redwing, Gastonia's deputy city attorney, said the city and its insurer settled the case because of mounting legal costs and the uncertainty of trial, not the case's merits. "There is no admission of wrongdoing (by the city)," Redwing said. Court documents and interviews with lawyers on both sides trace the case from Goff's arrest in February 1997 until its completion: The city fired Goff from her firefighting job in 1997 after police, acting on anonymous tips, found three bags of white powder, a pipe and pills in her fire-station locker. Prosecutors dropped cocaine charges after tests by the State Bureau of Investigation showed the substance to be inositol, an over-the-counter nutritional supplement. Goff was rehired but resigned later that year. In April 1998, she sued three Gastonia police officers, two fire officials and the city for more than $60,000. She contended they violated her rights by arresting her without a proper investigation. Goff claimed police searched her locker without her consent and arrested her without testing the white powder. In court documents, police said the search was consensual and that officers tested the substance before arresting her. Last month, lawyer Frank Aycock, who represents the city and its insurance company, said no written documentation existed of the field test. "They didn't write it down at the time," Aycock said. After Goff filed the suit, the city had the substance tested again by a different method. Those additional tests found traces of cocaine in the nutritional supplement, court documents state. And the supplement, the laboratory worker wrote in his report, is commonly used to dilute cocaine. A laboratory chosen by Goff's lawyers found no cocaine in the powder. In court documents, Goff said the white powder was not hers. She suggested that someone planted it in her locker. The case was scheduled for trial next month. For the past several weeks, lawyers on both sides have tried to reach a settlement. By a 5-1 vote, the City Council authorized a settlement last month. Redwing said he doubted that the city's insurance rates would increase because of the settlement. "We are cognizant of our jobs," he said. "We take it seriously, and we do not hand out money." Reach Tony Mecia at (704) 868-7731 or: - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D