Pubdate: 04 Sep 1999 Source: Capital Times, The (WI) Copyright: 1999 The Capital Times Contact: http://www.thecapitaltimes.com/ Author: Jason Shepard POLICE SEEK WAY TO DIFFERENTIATE POT VIOLATIONS While Dane County's district attorney has come under fire for large numbers of minor marijuana prosecutions, the Madison Police Department has been developing a new policy aimed at reducing criminal pot possession cases. Since 1992, the department has operated with no formal policy on what to do with people caught with small amounts of marijuana. Now, after seven years of giving officers wide latitude in determining whether to issue a municipal citation or refer someone for criminal charges, police officials are again drafting formal guidelines. "We determined, at this point, that we need to offer more guidance, and that guidance will come in the form of a policy," Assistant Police Chief Ted Balistreri said in an interview with The Capital Times. Balistreri is heading an internal Police Department committee that will draft the new guidelines by the end of the month. The internal policy review comes in the midst of an evaluation by Dane County District Attorney Diane Nicks, who said in an interview that she is concerned about how many small marijuana possession cases go through her office -- an office that she considers already pushed to its limits. One solution, she said, is to cut the number of cases that make their way to her office by having officers issue municipal citations rather than criminal charges. The Police Department policy in place before 1992 instructed officers generally to issue an ordinance citation to people who were caught with 14 grams, or about a half ounce, of marijuana or less. Officers had discretion and would make exceptions to the rule if the pot was discovered in connection with another crime or if the person had a prior drug conviction. While Balistreri stressed that an amount has not yet been determined for the new policy, it may be close to the charging guidelines established by the Dane County District Attorney's Office of 7 grams, or about a quarter ounce. Being issued an ordinance citation for small pot possession had been common in Madison since the 1960s. During the Vietnam War era, for example, the citation carried a $5 fine, a symbolic punishment that represented the city's liberal views toward smoking pot. But over the years, and especially in the early and middle 1990s, marijuana prosecutions have increased and the punishments have been much more severe. Today, people with even trace amounts of marijuana have been criminally charged with misdemeanor marijuana possession, and many of those convicted pay hundreds of dollars in fines, lose their driver's license for six months and face the prospect of having a criminal conviction. An ordinance violation, on the other hand, is a simple ticket that carries a fine of $100. According to an analysis of court records, 723 people were initially charged with misdemeanor possession of tetrahydrocannabinols, or THC, the official charge, from Jan. 1, 1998, to July 31, 1999. How many of those actually resulted in criminal convictions is difficult to determine. The Capital Times reviewed a sample of 46 cases -- every 15th case filed in the 19-month period. Of the 46 cases, 50 percent of them, or 23, resulted in criminal convictions for possession of THC. Nine of the cases were pleaded to municipal or county ordinance violations. Court documents do not routinely mention the amount of pot discovered by officers, but in some cases the amount was less than 2 grams -- essentially a trace. It is Nicks' goal to criminally prosecute small marijuana possession in only cases that involve other crimes or people with past convictions, with some flexibility to account for unique circumstances, she said. "If people have the notion that these are people using in their private homes and are somehow detected by police, that's not it. Those cases just don't come in," Nicks said. She said she is happy the Police Department is reviewing its practices and said it is important that the county's three largest criminal justice entities -- the Madison Police Department, the Dane County Sheriff's Office and the District Attorney's Office -- are on the same page. Consistent enforcement: Why the push for a new policy for Madison police officers? Balistreri said it comes after concerns were raised in the community, and within the City-County Building, about the proper punishment for people nabbed with small amounts of marijuana. "Part of it was a recognition from reviewing reports and having discussion among many of us that we might need a policy," Balistreri said. He added that the department has hired many new, young officers. "We now have a whole bunch of really inexperienced officers in the department," Balistreri said. "They don't have the dynamics or an understanding of the public sentiment on it." One officer might be particularly tough on people with pot, routinely arresting people for criminal possession, while another officer in a different part of the city might routinely issue a ticket for the same offense. And after the city's Police Department develops its guidelines, it will be important for the Sheriff's Office and the District Attorney's Office to make sure all three entities are operating similarly. Right now, the county's THC ordinance allows for a citation for possessing 25 grams or less, a little under 1 ounce. "Usually if it's less than 25 grams, our people are going to issue a citation," said Capt. Mike Plumer of the Sheriff's Office. But that is more than three times the 7 ounces that would trigger a criminal charge under Nicks' proposed guidelines. "What I envision is we, in the next couple of months, ... come up with a consistent approach and develop guidelines so we all behave in the same way, and distinguish between cases that should be handled as criminal prosecutions and ordinance violations, and then behave consistently," Nicks said. - --- MAP posted-by: Thunder