Pubdate: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 Source: Toronto Star (Canada) Contact: http://www.thestar.com/ Copyright: 1999, The Toronto Star Author: Harry Bruce Note: Harry Bruce is an editor with the Issues Network. CHOCOLATE - HEALTH FOOD FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM HALIFAX - No matter what you read in the dying days of '98, the Newsmaker of the Year was not Chretien, Clinton, Lewinsky, Starr, or any other fallible human being. It was chocolate, infallible chocolate, and, like a racehorse making a thrilling comeback in the final stretch, it waited till the last days of the year to charge home as the winner of the newsmaking sweepstakes. Chocolate eaters live longer: Study, roared a front-page headline in the Halifax Chronicle-Herald, just as tens of thousands of its readers were scouring shops for cute, scrumptious, gilt-wrapped goodies, chock full 'o chocolate, to stuff into their loved ones' stockings. Chocoholics may live longer, Harvard research reveals, chimed a National Post headline the same morning. In the Daily Telegraph, out of England, Paul Chapman reported that Murray Langham, psychotherapist and author of Chocolate Therapy: Dare to Discover Your Inner Centre, says the shape of the morsel you pluck from a box of assorted chocolates reveals your dominant traits of character. You go for a circular chocolate? You're a likeable, friendly, social butterfly, but perhaps a shade superficial. A square one? You're honest, reliable, balanced. A rectangle? You're a rock, just a rock, a source of strength for all who want to lean on you. You like to organize others. But you probably wouldn't get along with lovers of spiral chocolates. They're chronically disorganized and their love lives are messy. Since I have never met any chocolate of any shape that I didn't like - except possibly a brown cube filled with mucky green jelly that I plucked from one of the Laura Secord boxes of my boyhood - I don't know how Langham's theory applies to me. Come Valentine's Day, however, be wary if your new lover selects a triangular-shaped chocolate above all others. Your typical triangle-chooser gets things done, but seldom frets over anyone else's feelings. The deluge of chocolate news continued right down to New Year's Eve. Move over Mr. Coffee, said a headline in the National Post. Mr. Cocoa is coming on as the top bean. Chocolate fanatics were adopting the lingo of wine snobs. They gabbled on about climate, soil, bean varieties, good and bad years, and ``hints of fruit in the finish.'' Fran Bigelow of Fran's Chocolates in Seattle gushed about the ``robust'' and ``smoky'' flavour of chocolate made from Venezuelan cocoa beans, making the stuff sound more like single-malt whisky than candy. While chewing a Venezuelan goodie, a professional chocolate sampler paid it what was supposed to be an enormous compliment: ``It tastes like dirt.'' Some day, I'll find what I'm looking for among newspaper job ads: ``Wanted: Professional taster to assess Venezuelan, Belgian, German, Swiss and domestic chocolate. Room to grow. Flexible hours. Must be self-starter. No people skills required. Will pay top dollar to right individual.'' Just as 1998 ended, the Ottawa Citizen paid tribute to The Science of Chocolate, a sweet little exhibition at the Canadian Museum of Nature. ``Packed with 300 mind-altering chemicals, able to kill our pain and make our hearts go boom-boom-boom,'' the story exulted, ``chocolate is a natural pack of wonder drugs.'' It helps fight depression, stimulates your central nervous system, triggers the body's release of the same natural painkillers that exercise produces, and contains amandamide, ``which bears a connection to the effects of plant-derived cannabinoids, such as marijuana.'' Oh, mama, that chocolate high! In an otherwise dry and learned discussion of the trinitario beans from Central America and the criolla beans from Venezuela and Indonesia that go into the finest dark chocolate, Florence Fabricant of the New York Times lurched into such passionate prose she betrayed herself as a helpless addict. She described ``the intense scent drawing you in . . . exotic hints of clove, coffee, orange peel, even cedar . . . ``You take a bite, and as it softens and melts in your mouth, the complexity is comparable to a good red wine. The chocolate feels satiny, utterly smooth and flawless. The flavour lingers, but you must have another taste.'' The British Medical Journal has just revealed that a Harvard University study of 7,841 men found that the regular consumers of chocolate and other candies lived at least a year longer than abstainers. Chocolate, like red wine, contains plenty of the antioxidant phenols that not only reduce the risk of coronary heart disease, but also make your immune system more resistant to cancer. Chocolate, in short, is good for both body and soul. It was trite and obvious of Time magazine to play up silly Billy Clinton and pompous Kenny Starr as its Men of the Year. The most important story of 1998, the one billions of people the world over had been waiting to hear for generations, was the discovery that chocolate is Health Food. R. Whidden Ganong, chairman emeritus of the 126-year-old Ganong's chocolates company in St. Stephen, New Brunswick, was right all along. For decades, he ate a pound of his own mixed chocolates every day of his life, and even now he's a formidable chocolate chomper. Ganong is 92. - --- MAP posted-by: Don Beck