Pubdate: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 Source: New York Times (NY) Contact: http://www.nytimes.com/ Forum: http://forums.nytimes.com/comment/ Copyright: 1999 The New York Times Company Author: DIANA JEAN SCHEMO COLOMBIA: DRUG WAR FOR PEACE BUT THERE IS NO PEACE BOGOTA, Colombia -- President Andres Pastrana said Tuesday that ending the civil war that has ravaged his country for nearly 40 years depends on the rebels' willingness to help stamp out drug trafficking in areas under their control. Pastrana's assessment came as he prepares to open talks with the leftist rebels. The United States has strengthened his position by offering substantial help in increasing military and police power. Pastrana, who took office five months ago, is slated to meet leaders of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, the country's most powerful insurgency, on Thursday in the remote jungle town of San Vicente del Caguan. The government evacuated security forces from an area as big as Switzerland to allow the talks to take place, as the rebels demanded. In an interview at the Narino Presidential Palace Tuesday, the 43-year-old president noted that American aid has so far gone largely toward supporting police efforts to halt drug trafficking, mostly through fumigation. Pushed by Conservative Republicans in Congress, the United States more than tripled aid to Colombia recently, to $289 million this year from $88.6 million last year. This week, State Department spokesman James P. Rubin announced that a mid-level State Department official, Philip Chicola, had secretly met with FARC leaders in Costa Rica to discuss the rebels' recent declarations of willingness to eliminate drug crops in areas they control. Chicola also discussed the rebels' policy on kidnapping foreigners and the fate of three missing missionaries whom they are accused of having kidnapped five years ago. "The first enemy of peace is narco-trafficking," Pastrana said Tuesday. "If the FARC takes the decision to eradicate drug crops, they'll do it. Because they definitively have the influence to carry it out." Pastrana reiterated earlier criticism of American policy as relying almost exclusively on police tactics to fight drug dealing, and noted that some in the U.S. Congress had an interest in promoting war in Colombia. Under the current budget passed by Congress, Washington plans to spend $10 million on crop substitution in drug-producing regions, but $9 million of the money will go to Peru and Bolivia. "In the U.S. Congress, there are those who believe that only through repressive, policing measures can you put an end to this business," Pastrana said. "I maintain that for the first time ever, there's a different window of opportunity. And it's that the guerrilla group is saying it would agree to eradicate drug crops." "It's the first opportunity we have to consider our policy of fighting drug trafficking in a different way," Pastrana said. "Why not look at it." The meeting is unfolding against a backdrop of intensifying violence in a war that has torn this country apart for decades. Last week, the FARC took advantage of a temporary cease-fire declared by a right-wing paramilitary leader, Carlos Castano, to launch an all-out attack on his home base in the Nudo de Paramillo region. At least 30 people were killed, including a 3-week-old infant and a 3-year-old child. Some victims died after being dismembered, and were castrated afterward. Others were beheaded. Only 11 of the dead were identified. For several days, the fate of Castano remained uncertain, with the rebels claiming to have killed him. On Sunday, however, Castano contacted a radio station in Medellin to say he was alive. With the paramilitary cease-fire ending Wednesday, Pastrana appeared most eager to dampen expectations of instant progress in ending the conflict. He stressed that the talks beginning Thursday were not peace negotiations, but merely an effort to hammer out the logistics of eventual peace talks, and to gauge the willingness of the rebels to negotiate an end to the war that has claimed 35,000 lives in the last decade and made more than a million Colombians refugees in their own country. "On Thursday, we're not going to negotiate," Pastrana said. Earlier this week, he named four "spokesmen" for peace, including Nicanor Restrepo, an industrialist, Maria Emma Mejia, the former foreign minister under President Ernesto Samper, who will represent the opposition; Fabio Valencia, the president of Congress, and Rodolfo Espinosa, governor of Atlantico province. "We're going to install the table for a dialogue, to see if there's an interest in getting to the negotiating table," Pastrana said. So far, the rebels have not pledged to lay down their arms as part of any agreement. An analysis by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency last year predicted the rebels could win control of the Bogota government within five years. The questions that will be discussed over the next month in San Vicente del Caguan will largely involve logistics, including where and when negotiations will be held, and what role, if any, other countries should play in mediating or monitoring any agreements. Pastrana said that the single most important gauge for the future of talks would be whether or not a proposed agenda for negotiations emerges over the next month. Government security forces are now scheduled to retake the temporarily demilitarized zone in southeastern Colombia on Feb. 7, but Pastrana did not rule out extending the evacuation. He said that he believed the rebels were sincere in their desire to negotiate peace in exchange for participation in the country's political life, and added that he did not believe they were seeking control of territory. Pastrana noted that an earlier rebel effort to create a political party called the Patriotic Union fell apart with the steady, unexplained extermination of some 5,000 of its members over the last 12 years. "The great problem that the FARC has had is that the state never gave the guarantees that would allow them to pursue political activities," the president said. Asked what would happen if parties allied to the rebels won control of 40 percent of the country's municipalities, Pastrana said, "To me, that's fine. It's democracy." It was not clear Tuesday whether the top rebel leader, Manuel Marulanda, would come out of hiding to meet the president, whom he first met shortly before Pastrana's inauguration on Aug. 7. Rebel representatives in San Vicente del Caguan said that the preparations so far appeared to center largely around ceremonial, rather than substantive, aspects of the upcoming meeting. Fabian Ramirez, leader of insurgent forces in Southern Colombia, complained that the delegates Pastrana named to lead talks held "no decision-making power." "If that's the case, we may send similar delegates," he told the Reuters news agency in San Vicente del Caguan. "We could all end up around a table talking and nobody will be able to decide anything." - --- MAP posted-by: Don Beck