Pubdate: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 Source: San Jose Mercury News (CA) Copyright: 1999 Mercury Center Contact: http://www.sjmercury.com/ Author: JAMES BOVARD WE'RE FIGHTING THE DRUG WAR ON THE WRONG FRONT COLOMBIA has received almost a billion dollars of anti-narcotics aid since 1990. U.S. tax dollars are magnificent fertilizer: coca production is skyrocketing -- doubling since 1996 and forecast to increase another 50 percent in the next two years. Colombia now supplies roughly three-quarters of the heroin and almost all the cocaine consumed in the United States. 46or the Clinton administration, the obvious solution to this problem is more U.S. tax dollars. On July 16, drug czar Barry McCaffrey proposed an emergency billion-dollar anti-drug package for the Andean nations, including $600 million for Colombia. The Clinton administration subsequently indicated the aid package might go even higher. The United States is foisting itself deeper into a civil war that has raged in Colombia for decades. There are approximately 200 U.S. military advisers already on site, and U.S. personnel are now actively training the Colombia military. The Dallas Morning News recently noted reports that ``tens of millions of taxpayer dollars are going into covert operations across southern Colombia employing, among others, U.S. Special Forces, former Green Berets, Gulf War veterans and even a few figures from covert CIA-backed operations in Central America during the 1980s.'' The United States is providing key intelligence to the Colombian military from U.S. intercepts of guerrilla radio messages. Congress in 1996 prohibited any U.S. foreign aid to military organizations with a penchant for atrocities. The Colombian army has a frightful human rights record, but few in Congress seem to care about the administration's open flouting of the law2E Most U.S. anti-drug aid has paid for chemical warfare: blanketing coca-growing areas with herbicides from crop-duster planes and helicopter gun ships. Yet after continual escalation in the amount of spraying, the amount of land in coca production is four times greater than what it was in 1994, and now exceeds 300 square miles. Many farmers raising non-coca crops have been devastated by herbicides dropped indiscriminately on their fields. The Colombian minister of health strongly opposed the initiation of spraying in 1992. Coca farmers have responded to the attacks in part by going deeper into the jungles and hacking out new land for planting; environmentalists complain that herbicide attacks are a major cause of deforestation. Colombian environmental minister Juan Mayr publicly declared last year that the crop spraying program has been a failure and warned, ``We can't permanently fumigate the country.'' The Clinton administration has intensely pressured the Colombian government to allow a much more toxic chemical (tebuthiuron, known as SPIKE 20) to be dumped across the land, which would permit the planes to fly at much higher altitudes, Kosovo-style. Environmentalists warn that SPIKE 20 could poison ground water and permanently ruin the land for agriculture. Even as the Clinton administration decreed clean air standards strictly controlling Americans' exposure to chemicals that pose little or no health threat, it sought to deluge a foreign land with a toxic chemical in a way that would be forbidden in the United States. Increased U.S. aid will not enable the Colombian government to win a decisive victory over the guerrillas any time soon. The Colombian military is renown for losing almost all the major engagements it fights with the guerrillas. Even if the guerrillas are defeated, it's ludicrous to pretend that Colombians will no longer have an incentive to grow coca -- as long as U.S. laws make that crop 20 times more profitable than any other. It is time to admit that, regardless of how many temper tantrums U.S. politicians throw, the laws of supply and demand will trump posturing every time. James Bovard is an independent journalist and the author of ``Freedom in Chains'' (St. Martin's Press, 1999). This column is adapted from an article in the current American Spectator. - --- MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart