Pubdate: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 Source: Washington Times (DC) Copyright: 1999 News World Communications, Inc. Contact: http://www.washtimes.com/ Author: Tom Barrus and David Carter MCCAFFREY CREATES HIS OWN SMOKE SCREEN ABOUT DRUGS To the editor: Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey, director of the Clinton administration's Office of National Drug Control Policy, claims that: "In addition to concealing their real agenda, those who want to legalize drugs also go to extremes to confuse the public about America's efforts to fight drug use." (Dangerous drug smokescreen," Commentary, Oct. 7) Who is confusing whom? How can Gen. McCaffrey be fighting drug use when tobacco and alcohol, the most harmful drugs, are exempt from the drug laws? Gen. McCaffrey says drug use among youths is down, but tobacco use among youths actually is up. He says the primary goal of the "National Drug Control Strategy" is to teach youth to avoid drugs. Why then is the government imprisoning more than 700,000 cannabis smokers but not imprisoning any tobacco smokers? I don't see any police officers stopping the tobacco drug pushers from selling their type of drug to our children. Gen. McCaffrey says drugs are illegal because they are dangerous. If this is so, then why are tobacco and alcohol legal? Tobacco and alcohol are the most dangerous of all drugs. Gen. McCaffrey speaks of 52,000 drug-related deaths a year, which is more on the order of 10,000 or less, but is strangely silent on the 400,000-plus tobacco-related deaths and the 100,000 alcohol-related deaths each year in this country. Why is Gen. McCaffrey soft on these drugs like alcohol and tobacco? Why has Gen. McCaffrey surrendered to the alcohol and tobacco drug lords? Why won't Gen. McCaffrey demand that Congress either make tobacco and alcohol the controlled substances they are or else repeal restrictions on the drugs he targets? TOM BARRUS American Federation for Legal Consistency Golden, CO ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To the editor: Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey's column ("Dangerous drug smokescreen,"Commentary,Oct.7) seems to confuse fact and fiction. He is fond of describing his intellectual opponents' political positions with such words as "smokescreen," "subterfuge" and "concealing," which all suggest deceit. Drug policy reform groups, such as the Lindesmith Center and the Drug Policy Foundation, are open and forthright about the ideas they espouse. No one is hiding anything here, with the possible exception of Gen. McCaffrey, who has a vested interest in the drug war. I find it disturbing that a man whose profession once was waging war is now unable to recognize a war when he sees it and wages it. Yes, the drug war is a war, fought with armed soldiers (we call them police) and aimed at killing people -- people such as Mario Paz, a California grandfather killed in an August drug raid that turned up no drugs at all. Nor have law-enforcement authorities been able to link him and his family to drugs since. Gen. McCaffrey's Office of National Drug Control Policy considers these deaths collateral damage but as in all wars, some innocents must die. Vietnam has come home. Gen. McCaffrey's agency would rather destroy the drug user before he can do it himself. The most dangerous thing going on today is not groups' discussing different drug policy approaches, it is a drug czar who is afraid to discuss ending a bad war. DAVID CARTER Houston TX - --- MAP posted-by: manemez j lovitto