Pubdate: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 Source: Peoria Journal Star (IL) Copyright: 1999, Peoria Journal Star Contact: http://pjstar.com/ Author: Phil Luciano, columnist for the Journal Star WINE LABEL MAY BENEFIT OTHER VICES Sometimes, the goofy government almost drives me to drink. Turns out, that's what it advises. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (which sounds like a heavy-metal band but in fact is a federal agency) proudly announced last week that it will allow wineries to use labels reminiscent of the patter of snake-oil shills. One label states, "The proud people who made this wine encourage you to consult your family doctor about the health effects of wine consumption." No doubt, you'll soon see wine bottles not only in grocery liquor aisles but next to the aspirin and granola. Some critics argue the governmental blessing might encourage people to drink too much. Not that wine makers want you to overindulge. No siree, they'd never want you to buy too much of their product. Rather, vintners (along with the federal government) recommend daily moderation: one 5-ounce glass for women and two for men. This hits home, as I consider myself a wine connoisseur, though I sometimes have a hard time with those screw-tops. More importantly, I think these labels are the first step in the government helping us befuddled consumers make smarter purchases. So, we need more consumer labels: Firearms. Guns get a bad rap. After all, guns don't kill people; bullets do. Besides, you never hear about the health benefits of guns. A government label could proclaim, "This firearm is an effective pain reliever, especially if your pain stems from a no-good, shiftless, boozin' skunk of a husband or a two-faced, cheatin', lyin' alleycat of a wife. Use two slugs and call the coroner in the morning." Crack. Sure, crack cocaine can be bad for you -- if you use it. But if you sell it, it can make you rich. And if the government can bend to wine-makers' requests for the label, why not help other businessmen looking to make a buck? With the entrepreneur in mind, the government could tinker with the wine labels a bit: "The proud people who make this crack encourage you to consult your crack dealer about the financial effects of crack consumption." Gambling. Worrywarts always badmouth gambling as a quick way to leave you penniless. Well, yeah, that can be a bad thing, but what about the positive effects of poverty? How about this label, which we could put on lottery tickets, slot machines and gaming tables: "Gambling has been shown to empty your pockets, which means you won't have to worry about how to invest your money, which means you'll have fewer financial worries, which means less stress on your ticker. So double down and live longer!" Prostitutes. Yes, streetwalkers are disease-infected, potentially violent and (particularly in Peoria) often downright ugly. But without prostitution, Peoria would lose one of its key tourism draws. And small-town geeks trolling Peoria for cheap thrills create a spin-off economy (booze, smokes, prophylactics) that must run upwards of hundreds of dollars a year. So, rather than begrudge these enterprising businesswomen, let's embrace their economic value and put this helpful label on their foreheads: " 'Hos are people, too. Don't haggle or complain about prices. Tip generously, and afterward visit Peoria's exciting new riverfront." - --- MAP posted-by: derek rea