Source: The Cavalier Daily (University of Virginia) Copyright: 1999 The Cavalier Daily, Inc. Pubdate: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 Contact: (804) 924-7290 Mail: Basement, Newcomb Hall; Charlottesville, VA 22904 Website: http://www.cavalierdaily.com/ FOOLISH RULE I am writing this letter in response to Erin Perucci's column "Drug Use Doesn't Deserve Aid," (Feb. 18). Ms. Perucci's unfortunate piece, I'm afraid, is fairly representative of one of the most alarming aspects of contemporary American culture and policy in its attitude toward drug use and punishment. There is little doubt, as anti-drug activists literally point out, that drug abuse is among the most self-destructive behaviors in which individuals can and do engage. Unfortunately, the response most commonly favored by politicians and moralists, namely, the drug war, has proven to be one of the most self-destructive activities in which the polity has itself engaged. I shan't expound in any depth upon the legions of non-violent offenders who crowd our prisons and bestow upon the United States the dubious honor of boasting one of the largest prison populations (per capita) of any industrialized nation. Instead allow me to focus on the absurd "logic" of the Higher Education Act's denial of financial aid to students convicted of drug possession. Never mind that this is a provision that, because of its very nature, can only apply to middle- and lower-income students who need financial aid to continue their education. Never mind that the supposed dangers of college drug use didn't seem to impede Bill Clinton from becoming president, nor Newt Gingrich from attaining the speakership of the House of Representatives (the latter dismissed the significance of his drug use in this fashion: "all it means is that I was alive and in college in the '60s.") Forget all that. Consider merely the following: What the anti-drug zealots have instituted with this law is a system whereby individuals of little economic means who already engage in a form of petty criminality are denied the opportunity of securing for themselves the benefits of a decent education that might help them to become productive members of society that is every day more dependent on skilled labor for its economic well-being. The absurdity of the proposal baffles the mind! It is the logic of a political class hell-bent on punishment no matter the cost to society; damned the torpedoes, full speed ahead! What any rational society should engage itself in is the education of criminals, not the criminalization of students. "If a student loses financial aid and must leave school, the government and the school should provide rehabilitation and make sure that the student can get on track," writes Perucci. It's a nice thought, but where's the program? It's nowhere, because in a political culture like ours, so furiously committed to flushing our children down the toilet like just so many fine bags of Jamaican grass, any response to a problem that does not entail a hearty dose of punishment is mere "midnight basketball" and thus, despicable. David Flores GSAS - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake