Pubdate: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 Source: Daily Texan (TX) Contact: http://stumedia.tsp.utexas.edu/webtexan/ Author: Russell Cobb, Texan Columnist Note: Cobb is a Spanish literature graduate student. MCCAFFEREY'S COLOMBIAN DRUG WAR Yet another sordid chapter in the United States' involvement in Latin America unfolds... Barry McCaffrey, the nation's current drug czar and former commanding general of the Southern Command, the branch of the army in charge of all military affairs in Latin America, stood before an Austin audience on Monday night and proclaimed a near-victory in the war on drugs. McCaffey came to Austin touting the official Clintonian party line: What was once a "war" is now only "a series of community epidemics." McCaffrey claimed that to win the drug war once and for all, young people need viable role models and parental support. McCaffey's cliched speech did not even mention the U.S.'s increasing military presence and possible invasion of Colombia. Such hypocrisy could only be equaled by Jerry Falwell's admitting to smoking crack. Ironically, The same four-star general on stage Monday preaching the "just say no" doctrine of personal responsibility has demanded $1 billion in "emergency aid" from Congress to fight Colombian drug traffickers. McCaffrey's request already has the support of Clinton and congressional Republicans and will make Colombia the largest receiver of U.S. aid after Israel and Egypt. And unlike these two nations, Colombia is in the midst of a 35-year-old civil war which has recently escalated. That this $1 billion will go directly into financing the Colombian military in a war against coca growing peasants who sympathize with communist rebels is a fact McCaffrey failed to mention. This is only the latest chapter in the sordid story of American imperialism in Colombia which has taken two very bizarre twists this summer. First, a U.S. spy plane -- the same kind used to gather intelligence on the whereabouts of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade -- went missing in the jungles of Colombia after a reconnaissance mission with five U.S. soldiers and two Colombians on board. The plane, a C-17, left from a clandestine base in Ecuador and was to take pictures of guerrilla operations in the south of Colombia. The plane later turned up near the Ecuadorian and Colombian border with all seven on board dead due to a mechanical failure in the plane's radar. In this first episode, most Colombians, guerrillas, farmers and intellectuals alike, were outraged. To understand their plight just imagine what would happen if the Cubans established a base in northern Mexico to spy on Texas. Next, on Aug. 7, the wife of a high ranking American officer was arrested for shipping 15.8 pounds of pure cocaine from the American embassy in Bogota to New York. Her husband's only superior in Colombia was the drug czar himself. While this episode has proved embarrassing for all the self-righteous American military "advisers" in Colombia, it also dramatizes a real dilemma: 80 percent of cocaine produced in Colombia is consumed right here in the good old U.S.A. But since the problem of drug consumption in America is only a question of "personal responsibility" and having adequate role models, let us return to the problem of U.S. intervention in Colombia. The U.S. has never needed much of a pretext to invade Latin America and set up puppet governments friendly to U.S. business interests. It has never, however, invaded a Latin American country as large and as complex as Colombia -- which is exactly why it is trying to muster up a "Pan-American" force of Colombia's neighboring countries, Brazil, Ecuador, and Peru to go in and do its dirty work. The U.S. has already established bases in all these countries to monitor drug trafficking and the activities of the communist guerrillas who have achieved recent victories. To invade Colombia would mean not only destroying high profile drug lords like Pablo Escobar, but would also wipe out the small coca farmers who form the base of popular support for the communists. And while the idea of a communist revolution in Latin America sounds like a Cold War anachronism, the type of gringo imperialism that McCaffrey endorses behind closed doors (or at least not in Austin) may just turn Colombia into another El Salvador. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake