Pubdate: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 Source: San Jose Mercury News (CA) Copyright: 1999 Mercury Center Contact: http://www.sjmercury.com/ Author: Spyros Andreopoulos Related: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v99.n852.a06.html and http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v99.n851.a04.html IN DEFENSE OF STANFORD AS a medical writer generally familiar with the work of Stanford psychiatry professor Hans Steiner, I feel compelled to come to his defense. His critics quoted in ``Stanford tested drug on young inmates'' (Page 1A, Aug. 17) would have been better informed if they had read his study, ``Personality traits in juvenile delinquents to criminal behavior and recidivism'' in the March 1999 Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Based on my reading of the study, ethicist Arthur Caplan's contention that ``Stanford clearly was in there without appropriate consent'' is clearly false. Young persons were told their participation was voluntary and confidential and that they could withdraw without penalty at any time. They were reassured the information obtained would be unavailable to their parole board or influence their status at the California Youth Authority. A senior clinician interviewed each young person to evaluate mental health status for the purpose of determining competency to give consent. And each person completed a short questionnaire in an adjacent room under guard supervision (although the guards were not in a position to read or hear responses). Participants were also told they could withdraw from the study at any time and some in fact did. Beyond the uninformed criticism, however, is the issue of juvenile justice and why research is important. In the past three decades, judicial decisions and state laws of questionable validity have transformed the handling of juvenile offenders from a nominally rehabilitative approach to one that is strictly punitive, providing neither therapy nor justice. What we have as a result is a revolving door cycle -- incarceration, parole, back to prison and the need to build more prisons. The California Youth Authority's efforts to address the need for rehabilitation programs through research designed to understand the nature and causes of delinquent behavior should be applauded. And if our state laws, as you indicate, are confusing and stand in the way, the proper course is for the California Legislature to take notice and clarify them. Spyros Andreopoulos Director emeritus, Office of Communications Stanford University Medical Center - --- MAP posted-by: Don Beck