No law-abiding, taxpaying, God-fearing, American citizen of Franklin or Stephens counties should feel comfortable about the grand jury's conclusion to the Jonathan Ayers case last week.

Could it be that every legal act was considered so that one of their own could be exonerated? Just what is "justifiable homicide" anyway?

Did this term come from the "Kathryn Johnston" case in Atlanta or is it derived from "road rage" behavior?

There are so many questions left here that there is not time nor space to write them, but suffice it to say, it is completely inhumane to now flush the case down a legal disposal.

[continues 275 words]