HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 Source: Globe and Mail (Canada) Copyright: 2000, The Globe and Mail Company Contact: http://www.globeandmail.ca/ Forum: http://forums.theglobeandmail.com/ Author: Kirk Makin and Gay Abbate ALLEGATIONS AGAINST POLICE COULD TRIGGER DRUG APPEALS A vast number of drug offenders will probably seek legal avenues to reopen their cases after eight veteran Toronto Police drug-squad officers were charged with misappropriating funds, defence lawyers say. The officers are accused of stealing money from a fund -- known colloquially as the Fink Fund -- that was earmarked for paying drug informants. Every case in which any of the officers played a major role is now suspected of being tainted, lawyers said yesterday. "It will definitely be in the hundreds, and could easily run into thousands of cases," lawyer Edward Sapiano said. "These are crimes of dishonesty and breach of trust, so they really have an impact on an officer's credibility." Charged are Staff Sergeant John Schertzer, Detective Constable Steven Correia, and Constables Sean McGuinness, James Leslie, Joseph Miched, Jaroslaw Cieslik, Jonathan Reid and Raymond Pollard. Together, they have a total of 118 years of experience. They have been suspended with pay. In all, 75 criminal charges were laid on Wednesday, including theft, fraud, forgery and breach of trust, and the officers also face a total of 98 disciplinary charges under the Police Services Act. The incident, which is significant for the number of police officers involved, drew immediate calls for closer scrutiny by watchdog agencies. Defence counsel Paul Copeland said convicts may apply to the Ontario Court of Appeal to reopen their cases and introduce fresh evidence. He said the most important issue is when the misappropriation was alleged to have begun. Meanwhile, Mr. Sapiano said that cases still before the courts are likely to be stayed in light of the charges. The Toronto Police internal affairs unit began looking into the central field command last year, shortly after a group of criminal lawyers informed the force that clients repeatedly alleged that police had stolen from them. Over the next 18 months, about 50 drug prosecutions were stayed under mysterious circumstances by close-mouthed lawyers from the federal Department of Justice. In each case, one of the officers arrested yesterday played a significant role. Justice Department lawyers have since fended off more and more defence lawyers trying to force disclosure of details of the internal-affairs investigation. Mr. Copeland said prosecutors recently began taking the unusual step of offering details of the probe to defence lawyers on condition they agree to a gag order. One case involved Mark Morgan, a drug offender who is appealing his conviction. Justice Department lawyers are scheduled to appear before the Ontario Court of Appeal next week to respond to a demand for disclosure of the continuing investigation of the drug squad. In an affidavit filed in the Morgan appeal, Mr. Sapiano states that defence lawyers discovered in the middle of 1999 that their clients were accusing drug-squad officers of theft in similar stories. In a typical complaint, the affidavit says, a client alleged that $15,000 in cash and two diamond rings worth about $10,000 went missing during a search of his home by some of the officers. Mr. Sapiano says in the affidavit that he was not surprised when the complaints did not result in charges. He concluded that the internal-affairs investigators knew they would need stronger evidence than the testimony of convicted drug offenders if they were going to lay charges that could be successfully prosecuted. Police Chief Julian Fantino refused to comment about the charges yesterday, but the previous night he said "honesty and integrity are non-negotiable" requirements for his police officers. Critics outside the force yesterday urged better civilian oversight of police activities. Lawyer Peter Rosenthal said the role of Ontario's Special Investigations Unit, which probes incidents involving police that result in death or serious injury, should be expanded to include cases such as the drug-squad allegations. "Police police society, but there's no one to police the police," he said. Philip Stenning, a University of Toronto criminologist, suggested tougher internal checks and balances. "Increasing the number of people required to give signing authority makes it harder to abuse the system." There are no reliable statistics on how many police officers in Canada are charged with criminal offences, but experts say the number is extremely small relative to the United States. "Compared to other jurisdictions, we have a place in heaven," said city Councillor Brian Ashton, a former police board member. He suggested that the incident, while troubling, has a positive side. "It's a case of the system being more transparent, more accountable, and as a consequence it's more public." - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake