HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Source: Daily Herald (IL) Contact: http://www.dailyherald.com/ Copyright: 1998 The Daily Herald Company Pubdate: Fri, 4 Dec. 1998 Author: Associated Press Section: Sec. 1A CUSTOMS SERVICE SEARCHES PROMPT SUITS WASHINGTON - Returning to Chicago from Jamaica, Gwendolyn Richards was plucked from a line of air travelers by a Customs Service inspector and ordered into a bare, windowless room. Over the next five hours, she was strip-searched, handcuffed, X-rayed, and probed internally by a doctor. The armed Customs officers who led Richards in handcuffs through O'Hare International Airport and drove her to a hospital for examination suspected she might be smuggling drugs. They found nothing. "I was humiliated - I couldn't believe it was happening," said Richards, who is black and has joined a civil rights lawsuit against Customs. "They had no reason to think I had drugs." Richards, 27, isn't alone. Officers last year ordered partial or full strip searches or X-rays for 2,447 airline passengers, but found drugs on just 27 percent of them, according to figures compiled by the Customs Service. Sixty percent of those pulled aside for such searches were black or Hispanic. Customs officials say tough tactics are necessary to catch the growing number of smugglers who swallow cocaine-filled balloons, insert packages of heroin into their body cavities, even hide drugs in a hollow leg or under cover of a fake pregnancy. "We still have a major drug problem in this country," Customs Commissioner Raymond Kelly said in an interview Wednesday. "We have to do this." Kelly said race isn't a factor. "There are higher risk countries and higher risk flights," he said. "Those flights may be more populated by a particular ethnic group." Last year, the Customs Service seized 858 pounds of cocaine and 803 pounds of heroin attached to or inside international air travelers' bodies, officials said. More than 70 percent of the heroin seized at airports was smuggled that way. Acknowledging that searches "can get pretty traumatic," Kelly said Customs is experimenting with new technology that might reduce the number of body searches. The review comes after several lawsuits and complaints from travelers who say they suffered abusive treatment and hours of confinement. For instance: - -Two Jamaican-born U.S. citizens each filed a $500,000 claim in September over body cavity searches and X-rays in Tampa, Fla. One of the women learned afterwards she was pregnant and agonized that her unborn child might have been harmed, according to their attorney, Warren Hope Dawson. The baby was born healthy. Customs policy requires a pregnancy test before a woman is X-rayed, but Dawson said the pregnant woman was not tested. - -A 51-year-old widow returning from an around-the-world trip was held for 22 hours at a San Francisco hospital and given a powerful laxative while inspectors watched her bowel movements. Amanda Buritica of Port Chester, N.Y., won a $451,001 lawsuit last February against Customs. - -A Boston nurse, Bosede Adedeji, won $215,000 in a similar lawsuit in 1991 after she was stopped at Logan International Airport as she returned from visiting her sick son in Nigeria. A judge ruled the officers lacked sufficient suspicion to subject her to an X-ray and pelvic exam. Customs officials note that fewer than 2 percent of the 68 million fliers who pass through Customs each year have their luggage opened. Far fewer - 49,000 people - are personally searched, usually with a pat down. The 1,772 strip searches last year ranged from people told to remove their socks to passengers like Richards who were ordered to take off their underwear and bend over. Strip searches are performed by officers of the same gender. The Customs review found 19 passengers who were subjected to pelvic or rectal exams by doctors while inspectors watched. Drugs were found in almost two-thirds of those cases. Congress and courts have given Customs broad authority to search for drugs, weapons and other illegal imports. The Supreme Court ruled that Customs officers at airports and border crossings don't need the probable cause or warrants that police need to search possessions. Customs officers can perform a strip search based on "reasonable suspicion" that someone might be hiding something illegal. A Customs handbook obtained by The Associated Press advises officers that reasonable suspicion usually requires a combination of factors, including someone who: appears nervous, wears baggy clothing, gives vague or contradictory answers about travel plans, acts unusually polite or argumentative, wears sunglasses or acts sick. Race isn't cited. Customs officers can detain people for hours, even days, without allowing them a telephone call to a lawyer or relative or charging them with a crime. Inspectors say they keep detainees from making calls so that drug associates aren't tipped off. Generally, if someone is detained for eight hours or more, a federal prosecutor is notified. Richards is among more than 80 black females who filed a class-action lawsuit claiming they were singled out for strip searches at O'Hare because of race and gender. The plaintiffs include a 15-year-old girl, a mentally retarded woman, and a wheelchair-bound woman. Many decided to sue after seeing news reports on Chicago's WMAQ-TV about strip searches of black women. The agency has hired an outside contractor to review how inspectors deal with the public, and is exploring ways to make the system less hostile. In a test at Miami and New York airports, some passengers selected for strip searches are given the option of having an X-ray instead. The service is also studying new imaging technology that shows things hidden under people's clothes. Customs officers seek passengers' written consent for an X-ray, but it isn't required. Some travelers say they felt coerced. Las Vegas police officer Rich Cashton said a Customs inspector who stopped him at Los Angeles International Airport last year grew angry when Cashton asked what would happen if he refused an X-ray. "He said, 'If you don't sign this form, I'm going to take you down to the hospital and pump your stomach," Cashton recalled. "He was using that threat as intimidation to make me sign a consent form, which is definitely illegal." Cashton, who identified himself as a police officer, was let go. - --- Checked-by: Don Beck