HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 Source: Wall Street Journal (US) Copyright: 2004 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Contact: http://www.wsj.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/487 Author: Suzanne Vranica and Brial Steinberg TWO TIED TO OGILVY CONTRACT WITH U.S. ARE INDICTED NEW YORK -- A grand jury indicted one current and one former senior executive of WPP Group PLC's Ogilvy & Mather advertising agency, alleging the pair worked with unidentified co-conspirators to defraud the U.S. government. The indictment also alleges the duo made false claims while working on a lucrative account for the Office of National Drug Control Policy. The action surprised Madison Avenue, which largely believed the matter had been resolved after Ogilvy paid $1.8 million to settle civil charges in February 2002. At the time, Ogilvy, one of the ad industry's best-known shops, said it voluntarily withdrew $850,000 in billings to the U.S. because it lacked confidence in the documentation supporting the figure. Ogilvy's blue-chip clients include American Express Co. and International Business Machines Corp. Although Ogilvy is known for maintaining longstanding relationships with its clients, one marketing consultant suggested the indictment might lead to problems. "There will be clients that will not want to be with a company that has a bad mark on them," said Bob Schmidt, a former agency executive who now works at New York consultancy Bresner Schmidt. In a statement, Ogilvy said it has cooperated "with every government review and investigation of the billing missteps it voluntarily brought forward, including extensively cooperating with the U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan for more than two years. We are aware that several individuals have been charged in connection with actions that are alleged to have been taken while they worked on the initial ONDCP contract at Ogilvy. If true, their behavior was inconsistent with the high standards the company promotes and maintains." The indictments are likely to carry major ramifications for the broader advertising industry, which is under pressure to make its financial processes more transparent for clients. "This will prompt marketers to do agency audits," said Arthur Anderson, a managing principal at Morgan Anderson, a New York firm that provides consulting services to marketers such as Unilever, General Motors Corp. and McDonald's Corp. "Marketers are very trusting with the data they get from their agencies, but these indictments will cause clients to be much more observant." The court document, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges that Thomas Early, 48 years old, Shona Seifert, 43, and unnamed co-conspirators "participated in an extensive scheme to defraud the United States government by falsely and fraudulently inflating the labor costs" that Ogilvy incurred while working under contract. The drug-policy office, which is responsible for establishing the U.S.'s drug-control program, is a component of the executive office of the president. As part of its duties, the office conducts a national media campaign to educate young people about the dangers of illegal drugs. Ogilvy was awarded a lucrative five-year contract in December 1998. The government put the cost of the contract at $684 million, according to the court filing. For the initial year of the contract, Ogilvy was entitled to receive a fixed fee of about $1.6 million. Tom Riley, director of public affairs for the drug-policy office, said it "would be inappropriate to comment on the specifics of an ongoing case." He added that "all the alleged abuses here took place during the previous administration, after which new accounting safeguards were put into place that prevent" such activities from occurring again. Ogilvy's main role was to determine when and where to broadcast antidrug ads, which were donated by ad agencies around the country through the Partnership for a Drug-Free America, a nonprofit group. Ogilvy also was occasionally asked to craft ads. The agency created a stir with two jarring TV commercials that debuted during the Super Bowl in 2002. The spots told teenagers that by buying drugs they were handing money to the terrorists behind the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and their ilk. The defendants, Mr. Early, a senior executive at Ogilvy, and Ms. Seifert, who was named president of the New York office of Omnicom Group Inc.'s TBWA\Chiat\Day agency in February 2002, will be presented before U.S. District Judge Richard Berman Wednesday. Mr. Early and Ms. Seifert each have been charged with one count of conspiracy and 10 counts of false claims. Each count carries a statutory maximum of five years in prison and millions of dollars in fines, although prison terms would be lower under federal sentencing guidelines. A person who answered the phone in Mr. Early's office at Ogilvy declined to speak to a reporter. Mr. Early's attorney offered a defense of his client. "Sometimes, the government gets it wrong," said Laurence Urgenson, an attorney in the Washington office of Kirkland & Ellis. "We expect Tom Early to be fully vindicated." An Ogilvy spokesman said the status of Mr. Early, chief financial officer of the shop's New York office, is under review. In a statement, Ms. Seifert said she didn't commit any crime. "While saddened and dismayed by these fallacious charges, I do welcome the opportunity to present evidence of my total innocence. I am innocent of any wrongdoing. I will contest these charges. I know I will be exonerated," she said. - --Kara Scannell contributed to this article. - --- MAP posted-by: Josh