HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 Source: Edmonton Sun (CN AB) Copyright: 2000, Canoe Limited Partnership. Contact: #250, 4990-92 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6B 3A1 Canada Fax: (780) 468-0139 Website: http://www.canoe.ca/EdmontonSun/ Forum: http://www.canoe.ca/Chat/home.html Author: Mindelle Jacobs, OUR POT LAWS ACCOMPLISH NOTHING It's been a long time coming but the Senate has finally agreed to launch a thorough review of Canada's drug laws. Senator Pierre Claude Nolin has been pressing for such a probe for a year and last week his colleagues in the red chamber unanimously voted to appoint a special committee for the job. The question now is whether Canada will have the guts to shed the same prohibitionist philosophy that permeates the hysterical (and highly unsuccessful) anti-drug policies of the U.S., and implement a practical drug agenda. For now, though, it's business as usual. The pot busts along Highway 16 have become almost routine and numerous home growing operations in Vancouver have been closed down over the past couple of months. Even the police, however, acknowledge that the arrests have made barely a dent in the huge market for the highly potent B.C. bud. After yet another bust last month, a Hinton Mountie said his officers were only nabbing 3% to 5% of the pot circulating through his jurisdiction. So what exactly have the rash of busts over the past few months accomplished? Have we rid the streets of marijuana? No. Are there fewer social ills because of the arrests? No. Instead, the courts are more clogged than usual and the jails will be jammed with even more drug offenders whose incarceration will do absolutely nothing to curb Canadians' appetite for pot. At $50,000 a year per inmate, it's a painfully expensive way to perpetuate an unworkable drug policy. Part of the mandate of the Senate drug law review is to explore the health effects of cannabis and examine whether an alternative policy would lead to increased harm. There is already consensus in the medical community that moderate use of marijuana has little effect on health. And I can't see significant numbers of abstainers suddenly becoming pot heads if marijuana possession is decriminalized or outright legalized. Those who like the stuff are already using it, law or no law. Rather than banning pot, surely we ought to treat it like alcohol - with age restrictions and public education campaigns warning of the dangers of overuse. The U.S. would not be happy if Canada were to liberalize its drug laws, of course. We're talking about a country that's trying to extradite an American woman who fled to B.C. for her alleged involvement in a medical marijuana-growing operation. The woman faces a minimum sentence of 10 years in jail. This may give you some idea of why the U.S. federal budget for drug enforcement has jumped from $1 billion US in 1980 to more than $16 billion and why 60% of inmates in the U.S. federal prison system are non-violent drug offenders. We're not doing much better. Canada has the highest number of drug arrests per capita of any nation other than the U.S. The problem is not just Canada's unreasonable attitude towards pot but our policies regarding all illicit drugs. Three decades ago, the Le Dain commission recommended a gradual withdrawal of criminal sanctions against users. More recently, in 1997, a report on Canada's drug policy prepared for the Senate concluded that our drug laws are "soundly prohibitionist" and don't reflect the experiences of other countries. "The problems related to criminalizing drug users and its failure to reduce drug availability have not been addressed while the financial and human costs of criminalizing illicit drug use continue to rise," the report said bluntly. We would be smart to emulate some of the European harm-reduction strategies. In Switzerland, for example, where drugs are provided for long-term, dependent users, the crime rate dropped by 60% and unemployment fell by 50%. It's time to admit our war on drugs is a flop. - --- MAP posted-by: Doc-Hawk