HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 Source: Kitchener-Waterloo Record (CN ON) Copyright: 2002 Kitchener-Waterloo Record Contact: http://www.therecord.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/225 Author: Frances Barrick, Record Staff Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) JAIL TIME NOW MORE LIKELY FOR MARIJUANA GROWERS People convicted of operating large-scale marijuana operations in residential areas have a greater chance of going to jail after a landmark decision this week by the Ontario Court of Appeal, a local drug prosector said. "The appeal basically, as far as the Crown is concerned, confirms that conditional sentences are most often not appropriate" for pot growers who endanger the lives of neighbours and others in the community, said David Rowcliffe, a drug prosecutor who heads a Kitchener-based satellite office of the federal Department of Justice. "The Crown will be using the Court of Appeal decision as a precedent for all future sentencings," Rowcliffe said. Even Hal Mattson, a Kitchener lawyer who represents many of the people charged locally with these indoor growing operations, said the decision will make conditional sentences, the most common sentence given in local cases, less likely in future. Rowcliffe called the decision a "test case," as it should give the lower courts guidance on sentencing. Locally, the sentences have ranged from suspended sentences to 15 months in jail for this crime. More than 100 cases are slowly moving through the court system. The case that caused the three appeal court judges to turn their eye, for the first time, to this crime involved a two-year sentence a Stoney Creek man received last June for turning his family home into a large-scale marijuana-growing operation. In sentencing Khuong Van Nguyen last June, Justice Bernd Zabel of Hamilton said courts across Canada have tended to treat residential marijuana-growing operations leniently, but it was now time to make the "risk-reward ratio" less favourable for these people. "They have invaded our community with apparent impunity," Zabel said in June. "They have boldly entered residential areas where our citizens have saved to purchase dream homes for themselves and their families -- only to be confronted with large-scale, high-risk criminal activity on their street and even next door," the judge said. Nguyen's defence lawyer appealed the sentence, saying it was too harsh, and Rowcliffe, the Crown prosecutor who argued the case before the Ontario Court of Appeal, said he argued that the sentence was appropriate, considering the negative effect of such operations on communities. The appellate court agreed that jail was appropriate, but said two years less a day was too long a sentence. Instead, they sentenced Nguyen to the jail time he'd already served, which Rowcliffe said amounted to about 14 months. "We agree that the trial judge was entitled to decline to impose a conditional sentence in light of the evidence of increasing prevalence of this form of offence in the local communities," and the danger caused by bypassing hydro lines to steal the large amounts of electricity needed to grow the plants, the three higher court judges ruled. "However, in our view, the trial judge failed to give sufficient weight to the fact that the appellant (Nguyen) was a first offender; and that he (the trial judge) overemphasized the evidence of increasing prevalence when he imposed a sentence that is beyond the range for similar offences in Ontario," the judges said in their handwritten decision. - --- MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager