HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 Source: Edmonton Sun (CN AB) Copyright: 2004, Canoe Limited Partnership. Contact: http://www.canoe.com/NewsStand/EdmontonSun/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/135 Author: Mindelle Jacobs Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) LET'S LEGALIZE POT AND TAX IT Whatever proposed solutions emerge later this month at the workshop to develop a community drug strategy, action will inevitably hinge on resources. Early intervention initiatives, harm-reduction measures, treatment and law enforcement all cost money and, as we all know, the war on drugs is exceedingly expensive. It has also become increasingly clear that on the policing end we are often not getting value for our money. Earlier this year, Statistics Canada noted that the drug crime rate has risen 42% over the past decade and stands at a 20-year high, driven mostly by increases in pot possession. It is time to take a serious look at whether the enormous amounts of money spent on enforcement could be redirected to other areas where we might see some benefits. And so, once again, I plead for a common-sense approach to the drug war that will, in one fell swoop, deprive criminals of much of their drug profits. Legalize pot, tax it and use that revenue to fund treatment programs for people addicted to truly dangerous drugs. Our current approach is laughable, as was illustrated this week when Richard Bate was fined $2,500 and given a nine-month conditional sentence for growing marijuana. Firefighters discovered $20,000 in plants in an Edmonton basement after dousing a blaze that broke out when Bate and a friend were cooking up hash on the stove. Trivial fines are typical in grow-op cases. There's no deterrent, it doesn't stop people from smoking pot and it's a waste of police time and resources. So why bother prosecuting for marijuana offences at all? Of the approximately 90,000 police-reported drug incidents annually, three-quarters are for cannabis. There is no benefit to continuing to prohibit a drug that is relatively benign. Instead, we should focus on prosecuting those who traffic in much more harmful drugs such as cocaine, heroin and synthetic menaces like crystal meth. And we should impose lengthy sentences on dealers and routinely seize their homes, vehicles and other assets under proceeds-of-crime legislation. As for the addicts, unless they've committed related crimes of violence, forget about sending them to jail, where they can get all the drugs they want. On that note, Alberta is about to set up drug courts, as has been done in Toronto and Vancouver. The model emphasizes treatment over incarceration, with the goal of improving an addict's social stability and reducing criminal behaviour associated with substance abuse. Participants must follow a structured outpatient program and attend counselling. Random drug tests are mandatory. Drug treatment courts are also relatively cheap - $8,000 per offender in Toronto, for instance, compared with $50,000 to incarcerate a drug offender for a year. Ottawa has pledged to back more of these initiatives and an Edmonton committee studying the issue is about to apply for federal funding for a drug court. Calgary probably won't be far behind. As for the tax money we'd reap by legalizing marijuana, it could be used to build more treatment facilities. The Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission has youth treatment centres in Edmonton and Calgary, but none in the rest of the province. That's a perilous gap. We could also use tax money from pot on a host of programs to prevent kids from becoming addicted to drugs in the first place. Recently, I wrote about a long-term home visitation program in Edmonton that promotes positive parenting and child development. We need such initiatives in every community. The key is prevention, says veteran criminal lawyer Karl Wilberg. "By the time the police and lawyers and judges come along," he says, "it's way too late." - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin