HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 Source: Victoria Times-Colonist (CN BC) Copyright: 2006 Times Colonist Contact: http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/481 Author: Jeff Rud Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/af.htm (Asset Forfeiture) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) NEW FORFEITURE ACT 'OUTRAGEOUS END RUN' AROUND LEGAL RIGHTS As the provincial government gears up to use its new Civil Forfeiture Act, the B.C. Civil Liberties Association is decrying the legislation as an attack on the rights of British Columbians. The law, which came into force April 20, enables the province to seize property, goods or cash deemed by a civil court judge to have been gained illegally or used in the commission of an illegal act. If seized, property such as cars, boats and houses can be liquidated, with the proceeds going to the province. Civil Liberties Association policy director Micheal Vonn said the law is a B.C. government attempt to circumvent the Charter of Rights "by recharacterizing what we would consider essentially criminal procedures as civil." It will result in a lower standard of proof required to seize assets and also potentially limit the rights of individuals to legal representation, Vonn said. She said even people who support the concept of this law might be concerned that somebody's assets can now be seized without a single criminal or provincial statute charge being laid against the individual. "How could this be anything other than an outrageous end run around a person's charter rights?" Vonn said. Solicitor General John Les is on vacation and unavailable for comment on the new law until September. Civil Forfeiture Branch deputy director Steve Ing, who was seconded from the Victoria Police Department, said the office is already working on more than a half-dozen cases under the new act, but hasn't actually filed one in court yet. Lawyers employed by the government's legal services branch have been assigned to the office. Ing said the office will typically act on information from police or another regulatory government agency. If the office determines through its own review it has a case for civil seizure, it will then file an application in B.C. Supreme Court for a civil judgment against the property. A judge will decide through a trial whether the government has proven its case. That decision will be based on the civil standard of a "balance of probabilities" rather than the more stringent criminal standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt." While the case proceeds, the government can also seek an interim preservation order, which freezes the assets. Vonn said there are several problems with the legislation. There is no sound reason for it, she said, because a federal proceeds-of-crime law already exists. But this bill gives B.C. control over seized assets rather than Ottawa. "This is the province getting their foot in the door on collecting some of these proceeds for themselves," Vonn said. Ing said seized assets will be put into a special account and used for crime prevention, compensating eligible victims, and remediating property damage, but Vonn said there is nothing in the law stopping this money from being put into general government revenue. Vonn said the bill is also "over-broad in a number of ways" including the way it defines property that can be seized, and that it allows seizure for "any offence under a provincial or federal law." The law does not do enough to protect people who may have interest in a property but no participation in illegal activity, she said, using the example of a landlord who fails to inspect a home but has no involvement in a marijuana grow-op there. The civil liberties association also objects to the fact the B.C. law has no provision to waive a preservation order if the person requires his assets to pay legal fees or living expenses. "This is the state going up against an individual ... It's a stacked deck." - --- MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman