HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 Source: Nanaimo News Bulletin (CN BC) Copyright: 2006, BC Newspaper Group Contact: http://www.nanaimobulletin.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/948 Author: Russell Barth DRUGGED DRIVING LAW UNJUSTIFIED To the Editor, Re: New drugged driving laws. How can the government justify this new affront to our civil rights and liberties? Remember, this is the same government who wants to crack down on a crime rate that has been steadily dropping. Imagine this scenario: someone is driving around, stoned on tranquilizers, painkillers, cold-medications or some combination thereof. The driver gets pulled over and appears to the police officer to be visibly impaired. The driver blows zero for alcohol and his urine and blood samples test negative for illegal drugs.That driver is free to go and repeat the offence. But if the driver tests positive for even trace amounts of marijuana, which may show up in the body for up to three months, they will be booked for impaired driving. Clearly, this new drugged driving legislation is designed specifically to profile marijuana users. How medical marijuana users will fare in this new pogrom is yet to be seen. The new law will likely ignore the dangers of other impairment factors such as a coffee, cigarettes, cell phones, rowdy pets and passengers, over-the-counter or prescription medications, blood-sugar imbalances, fatigue, inexperience, bad driving habits, old-age and just plain old stupidity. To focus on any one thing is arbitrary and discriminatory. So much for Canada being a just society. Russell Barth Ottawa - --- MAP posted-by: Elaine