HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 Source: Gateway, The (U of Alberta, CN AB Edu) Copyright: 2007 Gateway Student Journalism Society Contact: http://www.gateway.ualberta.ca/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3149 Author: Trevor Larson Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) WEEDING OUT THE COMPETITION By Regulating The Drug Trade, Canada Could Cut Down On Law Enforcement, Protect Its Citizens And Make A Little Bit Of Extra Cash On The Side As Well Because of crimes that are related to the drug trade--most notably the killing of the four police officers in Mayerthorpe two years ago--many have been pushing for increased punishment for drug-related crimes recently. While a tactic such as increased jail time would theoretically make criminals think twice before becoming involved in the trade, there's no statistical evidence that supports this claim. The fact remains that it's just too profitable an industry to be deterred by harsher punishment. Instead we need to end this failed experiment called prohibition and regulate most, if not all, drugs. In 1916, Alberta introduced legislation--based on a plebiscite--that prohibited alcohol. It didn't curb people's desire to consume alcohol. In fact, criminal elements profited by providing alcohol to many who, despite the law, still wished to drink. Realizing the ineffectiveness, the government repealed the law--ironically, a move also based on a plebiscite--and introduced regulation of the sale of alcohol. Similar legislation for drugs could help Canadians for many reasons. First, drug dealers don't care how old their customers are--in fact, it's easier for a minor to obtain marijuana than alcohol in this country. Studies have proven that the most negative effect marijuana has is on the developing minds of people under the age of 18. If the sale of marijuana and other drugs was regulated, with stiff penalties for those who buy for minors, we'd see less kids obtaining and using drugs. Drug dealers are also not held accountable for the safety of their product. Tainted ecstasy hospitalized young adults in Edmonton recently, and similar cases happen all the time. The regulated sale of drugs would mean that one of the biggest dangers of drug use, drugs that are laced with more dangerous substances, would be systematically eliminated. As well, it would allow people to find a more accurate description of what they are taking, what it does to them, recommended doses and possible negative side effects. A more honest approach on the effect of these drugs would work better than just saying that drugs kill. If there's a demand for illicit drugs, like any other product, why should criminal elements be the ones who profit from it? Marijuana, for example, is more profitable than any other crop in Canada. Instead of letting criminals sell it, using the profits for other nefarious purposes, why doesn't the Canadian government make it and sell it, eliminating the criminal element in the process? People are still going to buy it either way, after all. Critics of this strategy argue that legalization would lead to increased use. A senate committee has recently argued against that myth, however. Looking at usage in countries of varying levels of drug enforcement, it was found that there's little difference in usage despite enforcement. One interesting example is the difference of marijuana usage between the Netherlands and the US. According to a 2002 study, Americans smoke nearly twice as much as the Dutch, despite its heavy anti-drug enforcement. Canada spends a huge amount of its anti-drug budget on law enforcement--money that could be used so much better in treatment and prevention. Drug policies in this country aren't going to change any time soon, especially under Harper's Conservative government. They're quite happy wasting billions on enforcement of prohibition that has and will continue to fail. Meanwhile criminals in Canada will continue to make billions off the trade of illicit drugs. In order to curb the problems associated with drug use, we need to start thinking outside the box, and find better solutions than prohibition. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman