HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 Source: Chatham Daily News, The (CN ON) Copyright: 2008 OSPREY Media Group Inc. Contact: http://www.chathamdailynews.ca Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1627 A JOLT OF REALITY Any parent who puts blind faith in the decisions of their children, especially ones not even in high school yet, is na(ve. Case in point is the recent incident at Tilbury Area Public School where three kids were charged with various drug offences for the alleged possession of marijuana, cocaine and prescription drugs. These were Grade 8 students; not even in high school yet. Unfortunately, it's not overly surprising to see a Grade 8 kid nailed for the possession of marijuana, but to tack cocaine and prescription drugs onto this is a sobering thought for parents. According to a school newsletter, five students had gone to a nearby park during a nutrition break at the school and "engaged in inappropriate behaviour." As a result, two kids were charged and five students in total received suspensions. Police charged another student in a separate incident. In order for students to leave the elementary school during a nutrition break, they must have parental approval. Tilbury principal Ken Gregory urges parents to not allow their kids to leave school during the two nutrition breaks. It makes sense. "When they stay at school, they are under our supervision and we know they are being looked after," the principal said. If students have parental approval to leave during the breaks, there is no guarantee they are heading home for lunch. They could instead be going elsewhere, such as a park, away from adult supervision. Gregory said the five kids involved in the incident had parental approval to leave the school during breaks. They don't anymore. By and large, parents are very proud of their children and pretty trusting. Hence the naivety. We may not see all the people our children hang out with at school, and therefore may not see all the influences on them. Or if we aren't deeply involved with their day-to-day lives, we won't be focused on our children's actions and interactions. A simple refusal to allow children off site during school hours may very well not prevent them from getting into trouble. Even hands-on, dedicated parenting is no guarantee your children will turn out as you hope. But such guidance will surely help. We feel for the parents of the involved children, as well as for the kids themselves. If guilty, perhaps this will serve as a wake-up call for everyone involved, and will become the one bad decision made by these kids as they grow up. It should certainly serve as a jolt of reality to every parent in Chatham-Kent. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom