HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 Source: Kingston Whig-Standard (CN ON) Copyright: 2008 The Kingston Whig-Standard Contact: http://www.thewhig.com/feedback1/default.aspx?e4=an_editorialemail Website: http://www.thewhig.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/224 TEENS HAVE SAME RIGHTS Random searches of high school lockers by police with drug-sniffing dogs have been routine in Canada for a long time. Not any more. Last week, the Supreme Court of Canada clamped a tight leash on the canine cannabis sniffers, ruling that warrantless searches were "unlawful" and a breach of privacy under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Many law enforcement and education officials will look at this ruling as a major blow against their efforts to keep illegal drugs out of our schools. They believe that the randomness of the searches has acted as a deterrent against student dealers stashing their goods in lockers and knapsacks. This may be partly true. But the Supreme Court justices ruled that teenagers have the same rights as all citizens. And they're right. Few adults would accept searches of their briefcases and desks at work, knowing that they were held under constant suspicion and subject to possible intrusions without notice. It's important to note that searches aren't banned outright. They can still be conducted if officials have reasonable suspicion. And in no way does this minimize the zero-tolerance policy for drugs at school. As good educators, teachers will just have to be more effective in relaying the anti-drug message and the seriousness of the issue in the classroom. - --- MAP posted-by: Derek